Sunday, September 02, 2007

The Lessons From America's Top Schools

The Lessons From America's Top Schools
M. Bakri Musa

Every year in May, Newsweek magazine publishes a list of what it considers
to be America's best high schools. It does not surprise me when the
exclusive "prep" academies or the super selective magnet schools make the
rank. However, when a public or inner city school is on it, I take note.
Not only is that rare, it also represents a truly significant achievement
on the part of the school, its teachers, students, and parents.
This year Preuss, a public charter school in San Diego,
California, ranked ninth. Earlier it had been designated a "California
Distinguished School." The school is unique in that admission is by
lottery (meaning, random with no self selection or bias) and restricted
to poor students whose parents have not attended a four-year college.
Being a public day school, parents do not have to pay any additional
tuition fees.
The school prepares its students to meet the rigorous demands of selective
universities. This year an astounding over 95 percent of its graduates
secured admission to top universities and colleges. These students would
also be the first in their family to enter college.
Creating an excellent school is not the challenge, especially
when you have ample resources and choices of students and parents. High
tuition fees alone would discourage those not sufficiently motivated.
Then you would practically guarantee success by admitting only students
from families with proven academic achievements.
Such a school may be successful, but it could not claim much credit. It
brings minimal added value. Nor could the teachers bask in the glory.
Those students would have done well regardless of which schools they
attended; their parents would ensure that.


The Lessons From Preuss

Preuss offers lessons for Malaysia in two respects: one, how to educate
our brightest students, and two, how to teach those we deem
"unmotivated."
For example, our residential schools admit only the brightest Bumiputra
students and at an early age (right after Primary Six). These schools
are also expensive, consuming more than their fair share of resources.
Yet their aggregate achievements lag behind those day schools that are
not selective with their admissions. These regular day schools are also
considerably cheaper to run.
At the opposite end of the spectrum, the fate and achievement (or lack
thereof) of those attending rural schools need no further comment.
Theirs is truly a national disgrace and tragedy.
The government's solution has been to build even more residential schools
to give opportunities to more students. Unfortunately, these new schools
are merely clones of existing ones. They repeat the same mistakes and
then use the same excuses to rationalize their failures. There is no
attempt at correcting the deficiencies of or enhancing existing models.
As for rural schools, the government has essentially written them off. As
those students are not children of the elite, their parents lack the
political clout to demand more. Come election time and they would be
satisfied with mere promises of new labs and computers. Meanwhile their
children remain stuck with inadequate facilities, crowded classrooms, and
inadequately trained teachers.
The government's solution has been the lowering of standards and resorting
to rigid quotas so these students could enter universities. There, the
failed pattern would be repeated, this time at a much higher level and
with far greater consequences, quite apart from the expensive price tag.
Those poor students would now have to bear permanently the destructive
emotional scar of crushed, falsely raised hopes.
A smarter solution would have been to provide such schools with competent
teachers, especially that of science, mathematics, and English. Double
their salaries if need be. It escapes me that while the ministry has no
difficulty producing a glut of teachers in Islamic and Malay Studies, but
when it comes to training teachers of English, science and mathematics,
the authorities could never exhaust their excuses.
I would have expected that we would have by now dozens of English-medium
teachers' colleges to train such teachers, especially since we are
teaching science and mathematics in English and emphasizing English as a
subject. This simple solution eludes the ministry's planners.


High Expectations

Preuss is a collaborative effort between the local school district and the
University of California, San Diego. Over 80 percent of the students are
from under-represented minorities, in particular Blacks and Hispanics.
Instead of resorting to the usual stereotypes as excuses for these
students' academic failures, Preuss made many innovations to cater to
their special needs. Thus the school year was extended to 198 days, up
from the traditional 180, and the school day lengthened to 396 minutes
from the usual 360. Class size was reduced to 25, compared to the
district average of 34. Students log a total of nearly 75,000
instructional minutes, compared to the State requirement of 64,800.
The school successfully encouraged a high percentage of its students to
enroll in Advanced Placement (AP) classes. According to its website, the
school "encourages a climate of high expectations and a strong academic
culture, with a focus on personalization of instruction." Hence tutoring
is readily available. The curriculum is both rich and broad. Apart from
fine arts, music and drama, students are encouraged to be involved in the
community.
Preuss is located on the UCSD campus. Thus students and teachers could
avail themselves to the vast resources of the university. The school in
turn provides excellent research materials for the university professors.
Preuss could serve as a model for Malaysia. Instead of the old
matrikulasi program, our universities could have their own out-reach high
schools on their campuses catering to poor rural students whose parents
have not attended college.


Parental Involvement

Preuss is a day school, meaning it does not have to divert
resources to non-educational activities like feeding and housing the
students, expensive chores residential schools have to contend with.
More importantly, these students remain under their parents' influence
and not uprooted from the family at a tender age.
It is universally acknowledged that active parental
involvement is the single most important factor in ensuring a child's
success at school. Malaysian national schools have poor students'
achievements because of this lack of parental participation. Parental
involvement at residential schools is even less, as such schools are far
away from the students' home.
There are many ways of encouraging parents to be engaged in their
children's school activities. The simplest would be to make them feel
welcome on campus. The other is to communicate effectively and regularly
with them, and to take them in your confidence. Preuss has monthly
newsletters to parents and regular activities involving them.
Acknowledging that many of the parents are Hispanic, the newsletter is
also partly written in Spanish.
Preuss goes further. It mandates that parents volunteer for at least 15
hours annually. Attending Parent-Teacher meetings would count towards
the volunteer hours. At its recent parent-teacher dinner dance, the
parents provided the food, decorations and arrangements. Such parental
involvement contributes greatly to the schools' success, quite apart from
defraying the costs.
Those students at Preuss would not have reached their full potential and
such heights of achievements had they attended the regular public school.
Then the excuses used by all - themselves, parents, teachers, and society
- to rationalize the failure would also be equally predictable. Preuss
has truly "added value" to the lives of these young men and women.
The lessons from Preuss are applicable equally to both our expensive elite
residential schools as well as those substandard schools in rural areas.
We cannot afford to waste the talent of our young. They should all be
given every opportunity to reach their full potential whether they live
in the cities or kampongs, and whether they are the children of ministers
or farmers.


----------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail has been sent via JARING webmail at http://www.jaring.my

No comments: