Thursday, October 22, 2009

[MToday] THE AFTERMATH OF THE 'BLOODBATH'

THE AFTERMATH OF THE 'BLOODBATH'
Posted by Raja Petra
Monday, 10 March 2008

So remember who put you where you are today. Remember who gave you
your job. The rakyat can hire and the rakyat can fire. We, the
rakyat, made you and we, the rakyat, can break you. Just remember
that and with God as our witness we shall not fail to do that if you
fail to do what you promised to do.
NO HOLDS BARRED
Raja Petra Kamarudin
Since yesterday I have been receiving a lot of phone calls from
people who keep asking me what position I am going to hold in the
government. I also have tons of e-mails in my in-box which I have
either not read yet or have not replied to thus far. Firstly, can you
please stop phoning so that I can get down to writing my article
(anyway, I have switched off my phone so that I can complete this
article). We can 'chat' about what the opposition needs to do later
plus I will reply to all your e-mails once the dust settles.

Now, with regards to my 'position' in the government. No, no and no!
I do not wish to hold any position in the government. I know some of
you have threatened to 'protest' in front of the party headquarters
if I am not offered at least a Senator's post. Hey, I do not want to
be a Senator or Wakil Rakyat or anything at all for that matter. I
just want to continue being plain Raja Petra Kamarudin, Editor and
Webmaster of Malaysia Today -- so please drop all this talk of me
'holding a position in the government'.
Secondly, Malaysia Today is going to continue playing the role of
watchdog and the conscience of the nation. We must continue to be the
eyes, ears and voice of the rakyat and this must be done with me
outside the government. Malaysia Today, which is already a nightmare
for the ruling party, is going to now also be the nightmare of the
five opposition-led state governments. And we are going to monitor
these five states even closer than we watch the federal government.
Now, with regards to the talk floating around that Tok Guru Haji
Abdul Hadi Awang has announced that Kedah is going to introduce Hudud
laws; this is not true. Tok Guru confirmed he never made such an
announcement. The trouble is, many of you wear these 'boycott the
mainstream media' T-shirts yet you still read and believe what the
mainstream media spins. Would you become terrible offended if I shout
'Bodoh punya orang!'? I really don't know what else to shout under
these circumstances.
Let me repeat what I have said many, many times in the past. PAS does
not have 150 seats in Parliament. In fact, PAS, DAP and PKR combined
do not have 150 seats in Parliament. Read my lips. "PAS NEEDS 150
SEATS IN PARLIAMENT TO CHANGE THE LAWS OF THIS COUNTRY OR OF THE
STATES!"
Anyway, 150 seats or no 150 seats, PAS does not intend to introduce
Islamic laws, PERIOD.
Okay, can we now get down to some serious work? Our first task in
hand is to set up an Ombudsman committee that will monitor all the
five state governments of Kelantan, Kedah, Penang, Perak and
Selangor. A man such as Tun Salleh Abas or anyone of his calibre must
head the Ombudsman committee which will comprise of men and women of
standing and with squeaky-clean reputations. They must be people like
Gandhi and Mother Theresa both rolled into one. Yes, Malaysia does
have plenty of such people.
The Ombudsman must be above the Chief Minister and Menteri Besar. It
must have the power and authority to summon even the highest man in
the state to come before the committee for questioning on anything at
all that may be perceived as wrongdoing, transgressions, deviations,
etc. And the Ombudsman must have the power and authority to recommend
the removal of any public servant or politician who may have
committed a breach of discipline, even if he is the Chief Minister/
Menteri Besar.
This Ombudsman shall be responsible to the rakyat. The meetings and
official inquiries it conducts must not be behind closed doors but
shall be open inquiries where members of the public who may be
interested in the goings-on can attend and witness the proceedings.
Everything must be transparent and open to public scrutiny. There
shall be no secrets. Public servants and elected officials work for
the rakyat. The rakyat are the boss. So the 'boss' must be allowed to
witness any public inquiry and proceedings convened to look into the
conduct of their 'employees'. There must be no compromise on this issue.
The government must not be race-based, and certainly not religion-
based. People chosen to head the agencies in any of the five states
must be based on capabilities and not because that person is Malay,
Chinese or Indian. Granted, the Federal Constitution of Malaysia may
state who can be Menteri Besar while the election promise was, if the
opposition wins Penang, then a Chinese shall be the Chief Minister.
But that must be as far as race considerations prevail. For thereon
no positions should be filled because we want more Malays or more
Chinese or more Indians in the government.
If qualifications and capabilities become the criteria, then Malays,
Chinese and Indians would automatically be represented at all levels
of government. Just give him or her the job because he or her is the
best person for the job and the racial balance would automatically
happen. You do not even need to try too hard.
All ongoing projects must be reviewed. Those that have not taken off
yet and which are clearly white elephants, projek mewah, above the
recommended cost, etc., should be aborted. Of course, those that have
contractual obligations will have to go on lest the state becomes
embroiled in legal tangles. But they must be aborted not for the sake
of aborting them or because they have been awarded to cronies of 'the
other side'. This would smack of political persecution and witch-
hunting, something the opposition has accused the government of
perpetuating and something we should not do as well.
Take note that the federal government will certainly squeeze the
states of funds so money will be very tight. The states will have to
engage a high-powered team of financial consultants to advice them on
how to run a state government and still develop the state with no
money. Kelantan has done it for 18 years. They inherited a colossal
amount of debt when they took over Kelantan in 1990 and yet still
managed to pay off all the debts plus carry the cost of running the
state in spite of no money.
The local councils are more corrupted than the infamous Royal
Malaysian Police. This needs to be immediately addressed and many
heads should be on the chopping block. The state governments must be
ruthless with no quarters asked nor any given. Let there be a
'bloodbath' if necessary. And send the files of all these crooks to
the Anti-Corruption Agency and demand that they be hung from the
highest tree. The rakyat will gladly pay for the cost of the tree.
The Malays should stop talking about 'percentage of Malay
representation', as should the Chinese and Indians as well. We
certainly want a meritocracy rather than a race-quota-based system.
Nevertheless, no race or community must be left out of the
government. So a delicate balancing act between meritocracy, yet
taking into consideration racial representation, has to be the game
plan here.
Remember, the opposition won these five states plus denied Barisan
Nasional its two-thirds majority in Parliament through promises and
rhetoric. The consideration of the voters the next election will no
longer be based on promises and rhetoric but on performance and
delivery. Many promises were made this election. Now is the time to
deliver them. Then, come the next election, the voters will either
continue electing this same government into office or opt to change
back to Barisan Nasional depending on how well or how bad the five
state governments have performed.
If you think that winning these five states and denying Barisan
Nasional its two-thirds majority in Parliament was difficult, then
you do not know what difficult is. Winning five states and denying
Barisan Nasional its two-thirds majority in Parliament was the easy
part. The difficult part is going to be in maintaining the confidence
and support of the voters. Abdullah Ahmad Badawi won 92% of the seats
in 2004 based on promises and four years later got massacred when he
did not deliver. The same thing can and will happen to the opposition
as well come the 13th General Election if it does not perform and/or
deliver its election promise.
Malaysia Today is watching. And we shall whack the daylights out of
anyone and everyone who misbehaves or forgets his or her promise. The
opposition won the five states and 82 seats in Parliament with the
support of Malays, Chinese and Indians. It needed all the races to
cross the finishing line. Just two races would not have achieved
that. One race would have been even more impossible.
So remember who put you where you are today. Remember who gave you
your job. The rakyat can hire and the rakyat can fire. We, the
rakyat, made you and we, the rakyat, can break you. Just remember
that and with God as our witness we shall not fail to do that if you
fail to do what you promised to do.
*************************
P.S. Sorry that since 11.00pm Saturday night Malaysia Today has been
very sluggish. Even I can't get in to update the site. Our traffic is
three times the normal traffic and we have added extra servers,
doubled the bandwidth, and even shut off the comments section to
reduce the load on the servers. Yet, the site is still sluggish. It
would help if you log off after reading the news and log back on
later when you want to read it again. I am pouring as much as I can
into improving our service but there is just so much I can afford, so
please bear with us.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail has been sent via JARING webmail at http://www.jaring.my

2008 polls - interesting facts

2008 polls - interesting facts
Mar 10, 08 6:20pm
Barisan Nasional only gained about 51 percent of the popular vote
from the 7.9 million ballots cast on Saturday.

However, it took 63 percent of the seats contested - or 140 of 222
seats in Parliament.

Interestingly, its peninsula-wide popular vote was only 49.79
percent, which effectively means that the opposition received the
majority vote in this part of the country.

However, when converted to parliamentary seats, BN has 85 of the
constituencies in the peninsula, while the opposition bagged 80.

Almost 40 percent of the BN's seats are in Sabah and Sarawak - 55 out
of 140.

In 2004, BN won about 64 percent of the popular vote nationwide and
92 percent of the 219 parliamentary seats on offer then.

As the dust settles on the 12th general election, we highlight a
number of quirky facts and figures.

Election trivia

The youngest candidate was PKR's Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad, who is 26. He
defeated Seri Setia incumbent Seripa Noli Syed Hussin.
The oldest candidate was grandma Maimun Yusuf, 89, who contested in
the Kuala Terengganu parliamentary seat. She lost her deposit.
56 also-rans from opposition parties and independent candidates lost
their deposits after failing to secure one-eighth of the votes cast.
The largest majority was won by DAP's Teresa Kok against BN's Carol
Chew, by 36,492 votes in the Seputeh parliamentary seat in Kuala Lumpur.
The smallest majority was just 14 votes for BN's Hamdi Abu Bakar who
beat Abu Bakar Haji Hussain of PAS in the Pengkalan Baharu state seat
in Perak.
Four pivotal players in the Lingam tape scandal also won: Loh Gwo
Burne (who recorded the footage), Wee Choo Keong (lawyer who
represented VK Lingam's brother during the inquiry) and R Sivarasa
and Sim Tze Tzin (listed as witnesses but eventually not called). All
four are from PKR.
There will be two 'lone rangers' in Parliament: Zulhasnan Rafique,
the sole BN survivor in Kuala Lumpur's 11 parliamentary seats - he
took Setiawangsa; and DAP's Chong Chieng Jen who won Bandar Kuching
in Sarawak - the remaining 30 parliamentary seats went to BN.
The biggest number of candidates was in the Sukau state seat, Sabah,
where eight candidates ran, including five Independents.
Debutant politicians

Prominent blogger Jeff Ooi - whose campaign was done online and funds
were raised through his website - won the Jelutong parliamentary seat
in Penang for DAP.

Other bloggers are Tony Pua (DAP, Petaling Jaya Utara parliamentary
seat), Elizabeth Wong (PKR, Bukit Lanjan state seat) and Nik Nazmi
Nik Ahmad (PKR, Seri Setia state seat).

Civil society activists who succeeded were Charles Santiago (DAP,
water-privatisation issues), Edward Lee (DAP, local community),
Elizabeth Wong and R Sivarasa (PKR, human rights).

Biggest blows

The losses in BN component parties will result in vacancies in
various ministries, forcing a cabinet reshuffle.

Ministers

S Samy Vellu (Works Ministry)
Shahrizat Abdul Jalil (Women, Family and Community Development Ministry)
Zainuddin Maidin (Information Ministry)
Abdul Aziz Shamsuddin (Rural and Territory Development Ministry)
Deputy ministers

Chia Kwang Chye (Information Ministry)
G Palanivel (Women, Family and Community Development)
Tan Chai Ho (Home Ministry)
V Veerasingam (Domestic Trade and Consumer Affairs Ministry)
S Sothinathan (Natural Resources and Environment Ministry)
Donald Lim (Tourism Ministry)
Fu Ah Kiow (Internal Security Ministry)
M Kayveas (Prime Minister's Department)
Parliamentary secretaries

Chew Mei Fun (Women, Family and Community Development Ministry)
P Komala Devi (Education Ministry)
Lee Kah Choon (Health Ministry)
Ng Lip Yong (Plantation Industries and Commodities Ministry)
S Vigneswaran (Youth and Sports Ministry)
Rahman Ibrahim (Home Ministry)
Dr Mohd Ruddin Ab Ghani (Science, Technology and Innovation Ministry)
Yew Teong Look (Federal Territories Ministry)
The full team from the Women, Family and Community Development
Ministry all lost in the polls.

All top MIC leaders were wiped out - president, deputy presidents,
two vice-presidents, women's chief and youth chief (one of the three
vice-presidents, KS Nijar, did not contest).

Post-election quotes

Anwar Ibrahim, PKR de facto leader, quoted in Star today

Some mentris besar in the past spent half-a-million ringgit to
renovate their offices. Such things cannot be an example in this new
administration.

Nurul Izzah Anwar, Lembah Pantai MP at a press conference yesterday

(On whether she will vacate the seat to force a by-election so that
her father, Anwar Ibrahim, can re-enter politics after a five-year
ban): I have already started working in my constituency. The question
does not arise.

PPP president M Kayveas, quoted in Star today

Prior to the elections, Barisan Nasional had kept on telling people
to show their dissatisfaction through the ballot box. Now they have
really shown it.

Sungai Petani losing BN candidate Zainuddin Maidin, quoted in Star today

It is not that they love PKR or PAS more that they voted against me.

The Chinese showed their resentment because of the economic backlash
they often complained about. So, PAS and PKR should not be overly
proud of their win (in Kedah).

The people may have to pay a price for their decision.


----------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail has been sent via JARING webmail at http://www.jaring.my

Get Rid of Abdullah and UMNO's Hang Tuahs

M. Bakri Musa
March 2008


Get Rid of Abdullah and UMNO's Hang Tuahs

It is utterly reprehensible that Prime Minister Abdullah Badawi refuses to
take responsibility for the debacle suffered by his party at the recent
elections. Even more despicable were his enablers in UMNO, its senior
leaders.
They all dutifully lined up peasant-like at Sri Perdana to
pledge their personal loyalty to Abdullah the day following the electoral
debacle. These latter day "Hang Tuahs" – individuals loyal to leaders but
not to principles or the organization – included Najib Razak, Hishammuddin
Hussein, and Rafidah Aziz.
I am certain they all obediently bowed down low and kissed the
man's limp hand solemnly. Pathetic! When they should have been apprising
their leader of the grim political reality, they instead stooped low to
humor and flatter him. Those are the duties of court jesters, not of
ministers and leaders.
If these next leaders in UMNO cannot tell Abdullah the bad
news to his face, how can we expect them to represent us in dealing with
even more assertive foreign leaders? If these are the faces of the
future leaders of UMNO, how could we entrust them with the fate of our
community? Are these "lembik" (limp) characters the future "brave"
defenders of Ketuanan Melayu?
This whole crowd – and them some – must go. UMNO must get rid
of not only Abdullah but also his entire retinue of enablers and
latter-day Hang Tuahs. There is no alternative. The only choice is
whether UMNO members do the dirty job themselves and on their own
timetable, or watch voters do it for the party. The recent election is
merely a preview; the next time it would be even uglier.
Former Prime Minister Mahathir is wrong in saying that
Abdullah destroyed UMNO. It was not only Abdullah who did it; he had his
supporting cast of enablers to help him.
It is not all doom and gloom, however. The party had faced
many challenges in the past and had successfully overcome them. All it
took was the courage of a few or even of single individuals, as Mahathir
did to the Tunku, the Father of Merdeka. Where are the young Mahathirs
in today's UMNO?
As for Mahathir, he admits to his grave mistake in selecting
Abdullah. Give Mahathir due credit, at least he recognizes his error and
is trying his best to rectify it. He has demanded that Abdullah take full
responsibility for this electoral debacle. Meaning, Abdullah should quit.
Mahathir however, can only do so much. Besides, he has little or no
stake in the future of UMNO except in so far as affecting his legacy.
Another party veteran, Tengku Razaleigh, has also called for
Abdullah to take full responsibility. It is a crying shame that with
today's UMNO, only the old are leading the charge for change. This
should normally be within the province of youth. This reflects how far
UMNO has degenerated as an organization.
It is not enough however for Tengku Razaleigh to give press
statements to indicate his displeasure with Abdullah. Ku Li must lead
the change and challenge Abdullah, as he (Ku Li) did earlier. Even if
Tengku Razaleigh were to fail, he would still have paved the way for
others to pursue the matter.
Other senior UMNO members like Musa Hitam, Tengku Ahmad
Rithaudeen and Sharir Samad must also step up to the plate and fulfill
their responsibilities. They must help ease out Abdullah gracefully if
for no other reason that the alternative would be too ugly to
contemplate. I have no wish to see Abdullah publicly humiliated; enough
that he would get out of the way. Let the old man enjoy his pension and
new wife.
It those senior members abrogate their responsibilities, then
it would be up to UMNO's Supreme Council members – the party's governing
body – to take the initiative. At its next meeting they should pass a
vote of no confidence on Abdullah. Even if that motion were to fail, the
message would once again have been delivered. Abdullah is a slow learner;
it takes a while for a message to sink in.
Such a motion, even if unsuccessful, would also pave the way
for other brave members to introduce similar resolutions at the upcoming
party's general assembly. In short, UMNO members at all levels must
continue to put the heat on Abdullah and his coterie of enablers until he
and they all quit in shame.
This coterie would include Najib Razak and all the current
vice-presidents and leaders of its Youth, Wanita, Putera and Puteri
wings. They are not leaders but enablers.
I do not share Mahathir's high opinion of Najib Razak. He has
Hang Tuah's blind loyalty but without the bravery or charisma. His
tenure as Defense Minister is best summarized by the currently unfolding
Altantuya murder trial; a tale of intrigues, assassinations, and
megabucks commissions.
Mahathir's confidence in Najib has less to do with Najib's
talent but more in Mahathir expressing his terhutang budi (gratitude) to
Najib's father, Tun Razak, for having "rescued" Mahathir after he was
expelled from the party. Najib without the famous "bin" after his name
would be just another nondescript civil servant, perhaps a district
officer back in his hometown. Tun Razak's other sons all had
considerably more talent than Najib. If Mahathir felt an obligation to
the late Tun, he (Mahathir) should have groomed any one of Tun's other
sons.
We Malays, and that includes UMNO, have no shortage of talent.
We just have to be more inclusive and exhaustive in our search. We have
to cast our net deep and wide, and not be content with netting the fish
that float by us. Usually those are the rotting or nearly rotting ones.
The vigorous specimens are out there swimming and enjoying the deep blue
water. We have to make an effort to get them.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail has been sent via JARING webmail at http://www.jaring.my

Defining moment for the nation

Dr Chris Anthony
Mar 7, 2008

It is a day away when Malaysians will go to the polls. After 50 years we
have finally reached the crossroads and the moment has come for us to
decide whether we want to continue navigating the same course or make a
change for what we believe will mark the dawn of a new era in Malaysian
history.
There is no doubt that the since independence BN government has given us
tremendous development and progress. Many of us owe the government for our
successes in life. Unfortunately the opportunities that were available to
us then are not there anymore for our children.
Unfair and discriminatory policies have deprived our children the
opportunities to excel in their own country. At the same time, the
government, is also directly or indirectly the cause of the numerous
problems that plague the nation today. These are due to the uninterrupted
rule and the absolute power of the BN government over 50 years.
History has shown that any government if given absolute power for too
long tends to becomes arrogant and corrupt. It tends to breed nepotism,
cronyism, favoritism and finally it loses touch with the masses. Its
leaders become surrounded by powerful 'yes men' who would glorify the
leader for whatever he does, even if it is wrong and disastrous.
A system that has been in power for too long needs a jolt of their
conscience to bring them back to reality and that the people at the
grassroots are not pleased with their performance. It needs a better
check and balance system in the form of a strong and effective opposition
in parliament.
Over the last 10 days or so, we have witnessed the vigorous campaigns of
the various political parties and their candidates, each claiming to be
the best. Each claim they have the best plans and strategies to bring the
nation and the people to greater heights. Most of them have promised the
heavens; bringing down oil prices, high minimum wages, allowance for
housewives, equal rights for all, free education, even free houses for
the poor and so on. Some of these promises are too good to be true. In
fact some of them are so ridiculous and are an insult to our intelligence
and integrity.
During this campaign period we have noticed a sudden change in the
attitude of our YBs; they have become so people-friendly, going visiting
house-to-house, providing cash and other forms of aid and even attending
funerals and so on. They virtually go down on their knees to beg for
votes from the very people whom they ignored over the past four years in
power. How we wish we had elections every year.
Many of us would have already decided on whom to vote for but there is
still a large number who depend on the ongoing political ceramah to make
up their minds. Well, the politicians can say and do what they want but
the final decision is with us, the voters. We should not be taken away by
empty promises and humble acts which are just political gimmicks to win
votes. Instead we must be mature enough to analyse the good and bad of
what they had pledged and after evaluating their merits and practicality,
come up with a clear mind on whom to vote for.
This election is not so much about peace, prosperity and security which
we all already enjoy, thanks to the BN government. It is also not so much
about business and physical development which we have in abundance, thanks
again to the BN government. Rather the 12th general election it is more so
about electing a government:
1.With a better check and balance so that it will use its powers wisely
and solely for the benefit of the people, a government that respects and
committed to human rights and empathises with the well-being of the all
marginalized citizens regardless of race and religion.
2. That will not bulldoze its policies against the wishes of the people
without prior proper and adequate consultation and debate.
3. That will treat parliament as the rightful place to make policies
4. That will respect the independence of the civil service, judiciary
and police.
5. That will be transparent and accountable to the people in all its
dealings that expends huge amount of the taxpayer's money.
6. Will respect the sanctity of the Federal Constitution and abide by
the provisions therein
This election is primarily about stopping the BN government of 50 years
from abusing the absolute power it had been entrusted all these years.
From a humble beginning it has become an aggressive giant ready to crush
anyone whore dares to cross its path.
As we step into the polling booths on March 8, let us cast aside all the
promises made by the political candidates, and walk in with a clear mind
on the choice of the candidate and party. Let not allow their pledges of
material reward sway our decisions at the last moment. Rather let our
wisdom and intellect alone decide on that important act of where to place
the "X" in the ballot papers. It may take us just a single minute to do
that but that that solitary minute in total secrecy would be the defining
moment that is going to determine the destiny of our nation.
Casting out vote is our constitutional right and we must take great
pains to fulfill that responsibility of ours with full patriotism and
diligence. Let's not be complacent and go out in full force to fulfill
our national duty.
Happy voting Malaysia.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail has been sent via JARING webmail at http://www.jaring.my

Ini adalah revolusi rakyat - Husam

Mar 09, 2008

KOTA BHARU, 9 Mac (Hrkh) - Kegagalan besar Barisan Nasional (BN) dalam
pilihan raya kali ini seperti satu revolusi, kata Naib Presiden PAS,
Datuk Haji Husam Musa.


"Ini adalah revolusi rakyat. Rakyat bangkit dan bersatu. Mesej yang jelas
kepada kerajaan ialah 'Enough is enough' (cukuplah!)", beliau memberitahu
pemberita.


Reuters pula memetik sumber yang rapat dengan Perdana Menteri, Datuk Seri
Abdullah Badawi berkata: "Apa yang berlaku ialah rasa tidak puas di
mana-mana - India, Cina dan Melayu. Ribut ini datang serentak dan akan
berlaku perubahan yang besar".


Awal-awal lagi sumber itu menjangkakan Barisan Nasional (BN) akan
mengalami kemerosotan terbesar sejak 1969 dan hanya akan mendapat
majoriti mudah.


Pada tahun 1969, Perikatan (yang kemudiannya betukar nama kepada BN) tidak
pula kehilangan sehingga lima negeri.


Reuters juga menyifatkan pilihan raya kali ini adalah satu referendum atau
pungutan suara rakyat terhadap pemerintahan Abdullah.


Perdana Menteri bagaimanapun enggan melihat kebangkitan rakyat itu sebagai
undi tidak percaya kepadanya.


"Saya tidak melihat itu (undi tidak percaya). Ini hanya pendirian rakyat
yang mahu saya meningkatkan lagi kekuatan," kata beliau.


Mengenai wujud tekanan pihak dalam parti supaya beliau meletakkan jawatan,
Abdullah berkata: "Tak tahu siapa yang tekan saya."


Abdullah tidak menolak kemungkinan keputusan pilihan raya ini memberi
isyarat bahawa rakyat tidak berpuas hati dengan beberapa isu, termasuk
kenaikan harga barang.


"Ini memberi mesej yang penting dan saya akan lihat isu berkenaan,"
katanya.


Dengan tamparan sebegitu hebat, Perdana Menteri enggan bercaikap banyak
dan beliau dipercayai akan membaca kenyataan yang disediakan oleh
pembantu-pembantunya.


"Apa-apa pandangan mengenai keseluruhan keputusan pilihan raya ini, saya
akan buat hanya selepas selesai keputusan semua kerusi," katanya.


Menantu Abdullah, Khairy Jamaluddin yang dilihat antara punca terbesar
kekalahan BN dipetik oleh Bernama sebagai berkata: "Kami akan melawan
semula".


Presiden MIC, Datuk Seri S Samy Vellu dan Pemangku Presiden Gerakan, Tan
Sri Dr Koh Tsu Koon adalah antara pemimpin kanan BN yang kecundang.
selepas keputusan Pilihan Raya Umum Ke-12 diumumkan setakat jam 3 pagi
ini.


Selain Samy Vellu yang juga Menteri Kerja Raya, turut mengalami kekalahan
ialah Menteri Pembangunan Luar Bandar dan Wilayah, Datuk Seri Abdul Aziz
Shamsuddin; Menteri Penerangan, Datuk Seri Zainuddin Maidin; dan Menteri
Pembangunan Wanita, Keluarga dan Masyarakat, Datuk Seri Shahrizat Abdul
Jalil.


Turut kecundang ialah 10 timbalan menteri termasuk Timbalan Menteri di
Jabatan Perdana Menteri, Datuk M Kayveas; Timbalan Menteri Hal Ehwal
Dalam Negeri, Datuk Tan Chai Ho dan Timbalan Menteri Pertanian dan
Industri Asas Tani, Datuk Mah Siew Keong, Timbalan Menteri Pembangunan
Luar Bandar dan Wilayah, Datuk Zainal Abidin Osman, Timbalan Menteri
Kewangan, Datuk Dr Awang Adek Hussin, Timbalan Menteri Pembangunan
Wanita, Keluarga dan Masyarakat, Datuk G Palanivel yang juga Timbalan
Presiden MIC, Timbalan Menteri Keselamatan Dalam Negeri, Datuk Fu Ah
Kiow, Timbalan Menteri Penerangan, Datuk Seri Chia Kwang Chye, Timbalan
Menteri Sumber Asli dan Alam Sekitar, Datuk S Sothinathan dan Timbalan
Menteri Pertahanan, Datuk Zainal Abidin Zin.


----------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail has been sent via JARING webmail at http://www.jaring.my

Anwar's Message to all Malaysians

A NEW DAWN FOR MALAYSIA
My fellow Malaysians,
Today at the ballot box, you listened to your heart with the firm
conviction that the time for change has arrived.
The people of Malaysia have spoken. This is a defining moment,
unprecedented in our nation's history.
Today a new chapter has opened. The people have voted decisively for a new
era where the government must be truly inclusive and recognize that all
Malaysians, regardless of race, culture and religion are a nation of one.
The people have expressed in no uncertain terms that they want
accountability, transparency and the rule of law.
Today unity, consensus, and mutual respect triumphed.
Tomorrow, we start working to build a brighter future, hand in hand,
shoulder to shoulder. This is a new dawn for Malaysia.
ANWAR IBRAHIM

----------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail has been sent via JARING webmail at http://www.jaring.my

Malaysia's Anwar is confident opposition will deny ruling coalition a two-thirds majority

Malaysia's Anwar is confident opposition will deny ruling coalition a
two-thirds majority By GILLIAN WONG,
AP
Posted: 2008-03-05 04:48:48

SINGAPORE (AP) - Only massive election fraud would prevent Malaysia's
opposition from denying the ruling coalition a two-thirds majority in
upcoming general elections, Malaysia's former Deputy Prime Minister Anwar
Ibrahim said Wednesday.

"The support for the opposition, particularly the rise in the last two
weeks, is phenomenal," Anwar, leader of the opposition People's Justice
Party, told reporters in Singapore, where he earlier spoke at a risk
management conference.

Malaysian Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi's National Front coalition
is expected to easily return to power in Saturday's vote, but politicians
are waging intense battles over key parliamentary seats that could
determine whether the coalition retains its overwhelming majority.

The opposition hopes to deny the National Front a two-thirds majority - a
symbolic, psychological benchmark because the coalition has won at least
that in every election in the past 50 years except in 1969.

The three main opposition parties, including Anwar's, have agreed to field
only one candidate in each constituency to avoid splitting the opposition
vote.

"It's very difficult, unless you have massive vote rigging, for the ruling
coalition ... to have a two-third majority," Anwar said, citing opinion
polls and government intelligence. "I'm absolutely certain of that."

Abdullah and other National Front officials have repeatedly voiced
confidence that they will retain their two-thirds majority, and say they
don't consider Anwar a serious threat.

Anwar is ineligible to contest the vote because a previous corruption
conviction bars him from politics until April 2008. But he said
opposition campaigns were making "major inroads" and claimed the ruling
coalition had resorted to intimidation and a smear campaign to erode
growing opposition support.

He said the Election Commission's decision to scrap a plan to use
indelible ink to prevent multiple voting reflected the ruling coalition's
anxiety over escalating support for the opposition.

Anwar said a number of election irregularities have already been
uncovered, including evidence that electoral rolls were being padded with
the names of deceased voters and that hundreds of voters were being
registered under single addresses.

The Election Commission recently acknowledged that more than 8,600 people
above 100 years old remained on the voter rolls, but insisted it could
not remove a name unless it had proof that the person had died. It has
repeatedly denied opposition claims of voting fraud.

The National Front won 199 of 219 parliamentary seats, or 91 percent of
seats, in 2004 polls, but has acknowledged it will likely win fewer seats
this time because of nationwide concerns about rising inflation, crime and
racial and religious tensions.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail has been sent via JARING webmail at http://www.jaring.my

[Mkini] Why Chinese voters may abandon MCA

Why Chinese voters may abandon MCA
Stanley Koh | Mar 5, 08 1:54pm

analysis Political pundits touching base with one another during
campaign rounds share a common anxiety and curiosity, as to whether
the large turnout at opposition campaigns in cities and suburban
areas will translate into votes against the Barisan Nasional (BN).

More importantly, they wonder if the MCA will take a beating by
Chinese voters who make up a substantial number of urban voters at
both parliamentary and state levels. There is a strong undercurrent
of disgruntlement and disillusionment directed against the MCA led by
Ong Ka Ting.

Even in the party rank-and-file, many are not satisfied with his
reason for maintaining an 'elegant silence' over numerous
controversies and challenging issues that are deemed to be
detrimental to the interests and future of the community.

MCA is increasingly being criticised as a 'marginalised party' within
BN, and seen as suffering from political impotence because of the
hegemony of the Umno leadership and Malay supremacy.

Political observers are quick to compare the era helmed by Lee San
Choon in the mid-1960s, Tan Koon Swan in the mid-1980s and Dr Ling
Liong Sik in the 1990s.

While Lee was noted for his courageous public remark "Swim or sink
with Chinese schools", Tan was popular for his charisma, political
vision and unifying efforts in bringing dignity and respect to the
party. Ling showed guts by taking a three-month leave of absence to
protest discriminatory policies against the Chinese community.

Ong, the anointed successor to Ling, pales in comparison in both
personality and leadership against the stature of his predecessors.

The community is both furious and disappointed with Ong, as reflected
in commentaries in blogs and newspapers columns. For all his
credentials and publicity stunts, he is being pilloried for his lack
of political vision and being an errand-boy of the BN powers-that-be.

One blogger, a lawyer turned broadcast journalist, elaborated on the
growing disenchantment: "The Chinese community is furious over the
apparent silence of MCA when faced with a barrage of accusations from
Umno over concerns of Chinese chauvinism."

Ong's favourite reply has been: "The MCA has its constraints because,
on one hand, we have to safeguard the interests of the community, and
on the other, we have to maintain racial harmony and national unity."

'Apologists for Umno'

Many Chinese voters are asking whether the MCA has walked the talk
despite being given overwhelming support in the 2004 general election.

They have found party leaders wanting in expressing opinions or
acting on such political issues as Umno hegemony and Malay
supremacy, abrogation of democracy, impaired rule of law, pervasive
racism, rampant corruption, abuse of power and mismanagement of
resources at local city or municipal council level, religious
intolerance, uncontrollable crime rate, runaway inflation and
creeping 'Islamisation'.

In 2006, MCA felt the humiliation of its initiative backfiring when
the Umno-led leadership demanded that the party should withdrawn a
collective memorandum calling for review of Article 121(1A).


An all-too-frequent question is why the party has to 'beg' for
financial allocations for Chinese schools when, under the Federal
Constitution, the community has the right to study its mother-tongue,
including having schools built to cater for growing demand.

Those in the older generation from an English-educated and middle
class background are questioning if the party is playing an effective
and efficient role in protecting their legitimate rights, securing a
better future for their children, ensure a level playing field in
their deals with other communities, and inspiring them with a
political vision.

Ong was also seen to have failed to protect the community's dignity
when Umno Youth issued a blatant warning to MCA to cease its public
campaign to declare Malaysia a secular state. Yet, the party
president recently claimed that the MCA leadership is equal to the
status of Umno leadership.

As a blogger wrote: "What is most disappointing is that some non-Umno
politicians have become apologists for Umno. The MCA is merely a tool
used by Umno to garner Chinese Malaysian votes."

Checks and balances

On Saturday, will the Chinese community vote in a stronger opposition
to bring in the checks and balances that are so obviously missing
within the BN fraternity? And, in the process, will MCA candidates
feel the brunt of their anger?

The worst-case scenario, as the wind blows against BN and Abdullah
Ahmad Badawi (Justice Bao as MCA calls him), the party is expected to
lose five to seven parliamentary seats in addition to the nine lost
in 2004.

Potential losses may include the parliamentary seats of Kota Melaka
(Malacca), Serdang and Petaling Jaya Utara (Selangor).

In 2004, it lost nine - Seputeh, Cheras and Bukit Bintang (Kuala
Lumpur); Ipoh Timor, Ipoh Barat and Batu Gajah (Perak); and Bukit
Gelugor, Buklit Mertajam and Bagan (Penang). It had marginal wins in
six seats.

At state level, MCA is expected to lose more than 14 contests -
marginal seats mainly in Penang and Perak, as well as Bandar
(Terengganu), Kesidang (Malacca), Kajang (Selangor), Lukut, Mambau
and Rahang (Negeri Sembilan) and perhaps Tras (Pahang).

In 2004, the party had won 76 out of 90 state seats contested. In 17
straight fights for parliamentary seats - where Chinese exceeded 60
percent of voters - MCA took 8 seats compared to DAP's 9.

No one would be surprised if the DAP gains at MCA's expense once more.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail has been sent via JARING webmail at http://www.jaring.my

SPR batal penggunaan dakwat pada kuku semasa pilihan raya

SPR batal penggunaan dakwat pada kuku semasa pilihan raya
http://www.utusan.com.my/utusan/info.asp?y=2008&dt=0304&pub=Utusan_Malaysia&sec=Terkini&pg=bt_05.htm
04/03/2008 5:05pm


PUTRAJAYA 4 Mac - Suruhanjaya Pilihan Raya (SPR) hari ini memutuskan
penggunaan dakwat pada kuku semasa pengundian pada pilihan raya umum 8
Mac ini dibatalkan.

Pengerusi SPR, Tan Sri Ab. Rashid Ab. Rahman membuat pengumuman itu pada
sidang akhbar di sini yang turut dihadiri oleh Peguam Negara, Tan Sri
Abdul Gani Patail dan Ketua Polis Negara, Tan Sri Musa Hassan.- Utusan

Batal dakwat kuku: Bertenang dan tingkat usaha untuk menang

http://www.harakahdaily.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=12963&Itemid=28
Abdul Halim Mohd Rashid
Tue | Mar 04, 08 | 7:12:42 pm MYT
KOTA BHARU, 4 Mac (Hrkh) - Sambil menyifatkan pengumuman Suruhanjaya
Pilihan Raya (SPR) membatalkan penggunaan dakwat pada kuku dalam pilihan
raya umum 8 Mac ini bukan sesuatu yang memeranjatkan, Naib Presiden PAS,
Datuk Haji Husam Musa meminta ahli-ahli dan para penyokong parti-parti
pembangkang terus memberikan tumpuan kepada kerja-kerja pilihan raya.

"Bertenang dan tingkatkan tumpuan untuk mencapai kemenangan," kata
beliau.

Ditanya mengenai tuduhan bahawa Barisan Nasional (BN) telah mencetak
ribuan t-shirt Bersih dan dipercayai akan digunakan untuk mencetuskan
huru-hara dalam pilihan raya ini, Husam tidak menolak kemungkinan
berlakunya tindakan itu.

Beliau meminta semua ahli dan penyokong pembangkang berhati-hati dan
jangan terpedaya dengan sebarang provokasi.

"Sebelum keputusan pilihan raya diumumkan, kita hanya mengambil
bahagian dalam pilihan raya. Itu sahaja," tegas beliau.

Suruhanjaya Pilihan Raya (SPR) hari ini membatalkan cadangan
menggunakan tanda dakwat kekal di kuku atau jari tangan pengundi pada
pilihan raya umum Sabtu ini.

Pengerusinya Tan Sri Abdul Rashid Abdul Rahman ketika mengumumkan
perkara itu mendakwa, keputusan itu dibuat pada mesyuarat hari ini
berasaskan nasihat dari segi perundangan serta aspek ketenteraman dan
keselamatan awam.

Pembatalan dakwat kuku untuk jamin mandat selesa kepada PM

http://www.harakahdaily.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=12960&Itemid=28
Abdul Halim Mohd Rashid
Tue | Mar 04, 08 | 6:02:09 pm MYT
KOTA BHARU, 4 Mac (Hrkh) - Tindakan Suruhanjaya Pilihan Raya
(SPR) membatalkan penggunaan dakwat pada kuku dalam pilihan raya umum 8
Mac ini mengesahkan bahawa Perdana Menteri, Datuk Seri Abdullah Badawi
amat terdesak untuk mendapat mandat yang beliau anggap selesa bagi
meneruskan pemerintahan beliau yang sepatutnya sepenggal sahaja, kata
Ketua Penerangan PAS, Haji Mahfuz Omar.

Tindakan itu, katanya, boleh dituduh mempunyai tujuan untuk
membolehkan pengundi-pengundi yang ditaja oleh Barisan Nasional (BN)
mengundi berikali-kali untuk memastikan kemenangan parti itu.

Tindakan itu juga sekaligus menyebabkan ramai pihak semakin
yakin bahawa kad-kad pengenalan palsu telah dikeluarkan secara
besar-besaran untuk membolehkan seseorang pengundi mengundi sehingga
berkali-kali, katanya lagi.

Malah, kata Mahfuz, pembatalan itu mengesahkan jangkaan bekas
Perdana Menteri, Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, bahawa pilihan raya kali ini
adalah yang paling kotor dalam sejarah.

Petang ini, dalam sidang akhbar di sini yang turut dihadiri
oleh Peguam Negara, Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail dan Ketua Polis Negara, Tan
Sri Musa Hassan, Pengerusi SPR, Tan Sri Ab Rashid A Rahman mengumumkan
bahawa SPR memutuskan penggunaan dakwat pada kuku semasa pengundian pada
pilihan raya umum 8 Mac ini dibatalkan.

"Penggunaan dakwat pada kuku boleh membantu mengelakkan
pengundian berkali-kali oleh seseorang pengundi yang ditaja oleh pihak
yang mempunyai kuasa. Pembangkang tidak ada kuasa.

"Sebab itulah tindakan ini boleh dituduh mempunyai tujuan
untuk membolehkan "hantu- hantu" tajaan Perdana Menteri dan BN, yang
dibekalkan dengan kad-kad pengenalan yang dikeluarkan secara
besar-besaran, mengundi berkali-kali," katanya ketika dihubungi.

Tindakan SPR itu juga mengesahkan bahawa BN berada dalam
keadaan yang sangat terdesak berikutan kebangkitan rakyat yang sudah
tidak tahan lagi menanggung kesengsaraan selama empat tahun di bawah
pemerintahan Abdullah.

"Bagaimana hendak menafikan bahawa BN khususnya Perdana
Menteri yang mengarahkan pembatalan penggunaan dakwat kuku itu?

"Bagaimana hendak menafikan bahawa BN khususnya Perdana
menteri telah mengarahkan supaya disediakan kad-kad pengenalan palsu
untuk membolehkan pecacai-pecacai upahan mereka mengundi berkali-kali
demi menjamin mandat kepada kepimpinan Perdana Menteri tidak dipersoalkan
oleh ahli-ahli Umno sendiri selepas ini?" beliau mempersoalkan.

Beliau menyeru Yang di-Pertuan Agong yang memperkenankan
perlantikan Abdul Rashid dan ahli-ahli SPR yang lain supaya campur tangan
untuk menyelamatkan rakyat dari terus dihina dengan
pembohongan-pembohongan SPR khususnya Abdul Rashid.

"Dulu kata hendak pakai dakwat pada kuku, lepas itu kata ia
hanya pilihan dan sekarang membatalkan pula. Mula-mula kata mesti matikan
setem pada borang pencalonan dan selepas itu kata tidak perlu pula.
Suruhanjaya pembohong seperti ini memalukan Yang di-Pertuan Agong yang
memperkenankan perlantikan mereka.

"Saya menyeru Yang di-Pertuan Agong dan Majlis Raja-Raja
Melayu supaya campur tangan," katanya.

Beliau juga menyeru rakyat supaya bangkit menentang penghinaan
SPR ke atas mereka.


----------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail has been sent via JARING webmail at http://www.jaring.my

PKPIM nafi sokong calon BN

Mar 03, 08

KUALA LUMPUR, 3 Mac (Hrkh) - Persatuan Kebangsaan Pelajar Islam Malaysia
(PKPIM) menafikan kenyataan kononnya dibuat oleh Setiausaha Agung PKPIM,
Abdul Muntaqim Zulkifli yang menyatakan sokongan terhadap calon Barisan
Nasional bagi DUN Tumpat, Kelantan, Dr Asyraf Wajdi Dato' Dusuki.

Menurut Presiden PKPIM, Mohd Hilmi Ramli melalui satu kenyataannya hari
ini, PKPIM tidak pernah mengeluarkan apa-apa kenyataan dan edaran yang
berupa sokongan kepada calon tersebut.


Katanya kenyataan media palsu itu diedarkan difaksakan ke jaringan dakwah
PKPIM.


Tegasnya kenyataan tersebut merupakan kenyataan palsu yang direka oleh
pihak yang tidak bertanggung jawab dengan mengggunakan nama PKPIM.


Beliau juga melahirkan kekesalan dengan sikap sesetengah pihak yang cuba
memburukkan nama PKPIM dengnan membabitkan sikap partisan PKPIM dalam
Pilihan raya umum ke-12 ini.


"Sebagai sebuah gerakan dakwah pelajar Islam peringkat kebangsaan, PKPIM
sentiasa mempertahankan prinsip non-partisan iaitu prinsip untuk tidak
menjadi proksi atau cabang kepada mana-mana parti politik.


"Kami menghormati Dr Asyraf Wajdi sebagai mantan Presiden PKPIM tahun
1999 hingga 2001. Bagaimanapun penyertaan beliau dalam kancah politik
dan menjadi calon dalam PRU kali ini adalah merupakan keputusan peribadi
beliau yang tidak ada kaitan dengan PKPIM,"katanya.


Tegas Hilmi, sebagai gerakan dakwah Islam, PKPIM harus merentasi batasan
kepartian dan perkauman yang sempit.


Sehubungan itu, beliau menyeru semua pihak yang bertanding dalam PRU-12
ini bertanding secara berhemat dan bersih demi memastikan kejayaan
diredai Allah.


Kenyataan media palsu yang cuba meniru logo PKPIM yang tidak mempunyai
nombor pendaftaran serta tidak bertarikh itu menyatakan pencalonan
Asyraf adalah wajar dan layak memimpin Parlimen Tumpat.


Selain kepala surat (letter head) yang berbeza sebagaimana yang sering
digunakan PKPIM dalam sebarang urusan rasmi, motto persatuan itu juga
di'palsukan'.


Katanya, motto PKPIM 'Hidup Biar Berjasa dan Menuju Generasi Pemersatu
Ummah' dipalsukan sebagai 'Hidup Biar Bersaja'. - mks.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail has been sent via JARING webmail at http://www.jaring.my

Resurrecting the dead

Resurrecting the dead
March 2008


PAS is contesting only 60 Parliament seats. They need 150 seats to control
two-thirds of Parliament. PAS cannot implement Islamic laws even if they
control two-thirds of the seats in the State Assembly without controlling
two-thirds of Parliament.


THE CORRIDORS OF POWER
Raja Petra Kamarudin
"I do not want to send you to jail," said the judge as he stared at me
like he was trying to burn a hole right through my chest. "But I have
to."


"I plead leniency your honour," was the only response I could come up with
in such short notice. "I am, after all, a first-time offender," I added,
hoping that that would 'melt' him a bit.


"It's not that I want to punish you," the judge replied without flinching
and with the same cold stare. "Sending you to jail is not about punishing
you. It is about protecting society from people like you. You may be a
first-time offender, but what is there to guarantee you will not do it
again? Society needs to be protected and that's why I have to send you to
jail. If I thought you are repentant then I could give you a suspended
sentence and bound you over for good conduct. But thus far you have not
even said sorry for what you have done or promised never to do it again."


I saw this as an escape clause and quickly jumped in. "But I regret what I
had done, your honour, and I promise never to do it again. I now realise
my mistake."


"Hah, a leopard never changes its spots. If you did it once how would I
know you will not do it again? Sure, you can always say you are sorry and
that you regret what you did. But I am not too sure if I were to release
you that you would keep your word."


********************
No, I did not really go to court. And, no, I was not sent to jail. In
fact, the entire dialogue above never happened. I just put that in to
dramatise what the Islamic Party of Malaysia (PAS) must be going through
in the ongoing 'trial'. For eight years, the Chinese in particular and
the non-Malays in general, have been screaming about the Islamic State
Document (ISD) that PAS introduced in Terengganu not long after the Tenth
General Election in 1999. Actually, long before PAS did that in
Terengganu, they had done the same in Kelantan about eight or nine years
earlier. But the ISD that PAS launched in Kelantan not long after the
1990 general election and the one launched in Terengganu not long after
the 1999 general election both went nowhere. And PAS knew they would get
nowhere with it.


Why in heaven's name did they launch them then? This would probably be
what many of you would now be asking. Well, it's simple, really. PAS is
an Islamic party and it is therefore their 'duty' to launch the ISD. What
else would you have expected PAS to do? I would be very surprised if they
had NOT launched them.
But PAS had only 27 Parliamentary seats in 1999 and even less in 1990.
They would need at least 150 seats to control two-thirds of Parliament
before they can implement the ISD and change Malaysia from a Secular
State to an Islamic State.


Okay, PAS controlled Kelantan in 1990 and Terengganu in 1999. Maybe PAS
did not, on both those occasions, have 150 seats in Parliament or
controlled two-thirds of Parliament. But they did, in 1990, control
two-thirds of the seats in the Kelantan State Assembly in and, in 1999,
in the Terengganu State Assembly. So the ISD could have been implemented
in these two states even though PAS would not have been able to do so at
Federal level. Why, then, did PAS not do so at state level?
PAS could not do so at state level because, to make constitutional changes
at state level, you require the approval of Parliament and PAS did not
have 150 seats in Parliament or control two-thirds of Parliament. But
this should still not stop PAS from 'pushing' the issue. Whether PAS does
or does not control Parliament is not the issue. PAS' job is deliver its
election promise -- the implementation of Islam -- and then leave it to
Parliament to sort the whole thing out.


We must remember, PAS was under pressure. Umno was calling PAS a liar.
UMNO was accusing PAS of cheating the voters by not delivering its
election promise. The simple-minded village folks (orang kampong) are not
able to rationalise issues the way we can. These people would swallow the
Umno propaganda hook, line and sinker. "PAS bohong! PAS tipu! Sebelum
pilihan raya janji Islam. Bila sudah menang pilihan raya diam, tak buat."


PAS had to show that it delivers its election promises, or at least try to
deliver even if it does not have the power to do so. We promise, we
deliver. If Barisan Nasional blocks it at Federal level because they
control more than two-thirds of parliament, then PAS can't be blamed for
that.


PAS' job is to try to deliver what it had been mandated to do by the
voters who voted for it. And PAS did just that. So it fulfilled its
election promise. But Malaysia still remained a Secular State as everyone
thought it would, PAS included. That is not PAS' fault though. That was
Barisan Nasional's fault. So Barisan Nasional is the chow lang in the
eyes of the Malay voters, not PAS.


When Umno challenged PAS to 'deliver its election promise', it did not
think that PAS would actually do it. This is because PAS can't act alone
but must act in the spirit of the opposition coalition, then called
Barisan Alternatif. Umno was calling PAS' bluff. Then, when PAS fails to
deliver, Umno can turn around and call PAS a liar and a cheat. Janji tapi
tak buat.


Umno was in fact caught off-guard when PAS 'accepted' Umno's challenge and
announced the launching of the ISD. Not only Umno was caught of-guard but
the other three members of Barisan Alternatif as well -- DAP, PKN (now
PKR) and PRM (now merged with PKN into PKR). DAP, PKN and PRM did not
agree with the ISD and told PAS so. DAP even left Barisan Alternatif in a
huff.


Umno realised that challenging PAS was a mistake. It thought the challenge
was safe because surely PAS would not act alone and DAP, PKN and PRM would
object strongly to the ISD. But PAS did act alone in spite of the protests
from DAP, PKN and PRM. PAS had no choice, really. It was being challenged
by the other Malay-dominant party and was being called a liar and a
cheat. Either it faced Umno and accepted the challenge or else PAS would
become irrelevant and might as well close down just like Semangat 46
before that.


Now it was Umno that was in a bind. Umno never for one minute suspected
that PAS would put the opposition coalition in jeopardy by going against
the wishes of the other three coalition members. But PAS did and the
coalition practically broke up (hidup segan, mati tak mahu). PAS,
however, managed to redeem itself in the eyes of the Malays. And Umno
responded by hurriedly declaring, on 19 September 2001, that Malaysia is
already an Islamic country, so why do we need PAS? PAS can only promise.
It does not control two-thirds of Parliament so it can't deliver. Umno,
however, through Barisan Nasional, does control two-thirds of Parliament.
So Umno does not need to 'promise' like PAS does. Umno can deliver. So
Umno, in a way, became Malaysia's new Islamic party, dislodging PAS from
that perch.


Many may have not noticed this, but since the 2004 general election, when
PAS lost Terengganu, almost lost Kelantan, and saw its 27 Parliament
seats reduced to just nine, PAS has stopped talking about the ISD. DAP
knows this. Talk to people like Ronnie Liu. He can tell you that PAS
wants to treat the ISD as an embarrassing mistake that should be buried
in the past and allowed to remain buried. But people would not allow it
to remain buried. They kept resurrecting the ISD issue even though PAS
themselves, those who gave birth to it, would like it to remain buried.
It was no longer PAS that was talking about the ISD. It was those who
would like this stigma to hang over the head of what could be the most
successful and powerful opposition party.


Okay, PAS made a mistake in the past. They have learned from this mistake.
But do we want to keep harping on the past? How far back into the past
should we go? Is there any cut-off date? Should we continue killing every
Japanese we see in Malaysia because of what they did to us during the
Second World War? In 1834, the Chinese in Lukut massacred Raja Busu and
his entire family plus hundreds of Malays. Raja Busu was a member of the
Selangor Royal Family. Should I still hold that against the Chinese, in
particular the Chinese from Lukut? Or maybe I am entitled to avenge the
death of my ancestors by 'teaching' the Lukut Chinese a lesson?
Sometimes the past is better left in the past, especially when all has
been forgiven, though not quite forgotten. What the Chinese in Lukut did
to my family in 1834 and what the Japanese did to Malayans during the
Second World War is now a footnote in history. What PAS did two elections
ago is also a footnote in history. Should we condemn the Indians for
giving 90% of the votes to Barisan Nasional (MIC) in the recent Ijok
by-election or should we instead support them and stand by HINDRAF
because of what they are doing today rather than because of what they did
a few months ago in Ijok?


Today, PAS is talking in another nada or tone of voice. That is what
counts. Yesterday is yesterday. Today is what matters. And if today we
still want to talk about what PAS did yesterday, then I too should
condemn the Chinese for what they did yesterday to my family in Lukut and
what the Indians did yesterday in Ijok. By the way, do you know we
eventually lost Lukut, Linggi and the areas surrounding it because of
this massacre? The British stepped in on the excuse of 'restoring law and
order' and to protect their business interests. Negeri Sembilan would not
exist and today it would still be part of Selangor if the Chinese had not
started a 'war' down there.


Yesterday, 100 pro-government Malay Islamic groups led by ABIM announced
that they want the government to Islamise this country. I need not go
into details as you can read it here (Pro-government Islamic groups
demanding stronger role for Islam ahead of polls in Malaysia) and here
(PEMBELA declaration & press statement ).


Let us look at the track record.


Was it not PAS that summoned the Kelantan Hindus for a meeting and offered
them a site for a Hindu temple even though they did not ask for one? Umno,
however, during the time it was ruling Kelantan, blocked the building of a
Hindu temple. Was it not Umno that declared Buddhist statues haram and
blocked its construction in the state of Sabah? The court case is pending
even as you read this. Was it not Umno that demolished Hindu temples in
Selangor? Was it not Umno that shot tear gas and water cannons into the
Batu Caves temple grounds? Was it not PAS that allowed pigs to be
slaughtered in Kelantan while Umno, during the time it ruled Kelantan,
forbade it? Look at the track record. Let the track record speak for
itself.


Take a drive to Kelantan these next few days before the general election.
Go visit the Kota Bharu market. See for yourself all the women selling at
the Kota Bharu market. Yes, the women control the market. The women
monopolise the economic scene. The batek and songket manufacturers are
mostly all women. The signboards carry women's names. If you trade with
them, you trade with the women. The women negotiate with you and the
women handle all the money, not the men.


Where are the so-called 'separate check-out counters'? The men and women
stand in the same line and the women serve you and you pay the women at
the check-out counters. There are only separate toilets for men and
women. The rest are all men-women mixed.


Go stay at the state government-owned Perdana Hotel in Kota Bharu. They
have only one swimming pool. And you and your wife both swim in that same
one pool. There are no two swimming pools, one for men and another for
women.


You want to drink, fine, order a beer and send me the bill. Yes, you can
get drunk in Kota Bharu if you want to, as you could in Terengganu when
PAS was ruling that state from 1999 to 2004. Okay, Terengganu banned
gambling when PAS was running that state. But that was because the PAS
Menteri Besar had a meeting with the non-Muslims and they agreed that
gambling is bad and should be banned. Some argue that gambling is Chinese
culture and should not be banned. Well, why did the non-Muslims then ask
the Menteri Besar to ban gambling? Anyway, I have made about ten trips to
China thus far and have travelled the length and breadth of that country
and none of the Chinese I met in China say that gambling is their
culture. In fact, the Chinese government bans gambling and will not allow
casinos on its soil.


If just because you want to gamble you would rather have Barisan Nasional
rule Kelantan and Terengganu, then the Chinese are even shallower than I
thought. But if it is really that important and really Chinese 'religion'
that you gamble, then make this point clear to PAS. And if gambling is
more important than a good future for your family, I am sure PAS will
accommodate the Chinese and not interfere with Chinese 'religion', as it
has promised. But please do not ask PAS to legalise child prostitution so
that you can sell your children to the pimps for a profit as much as in
some societies this is acceptable and very rampant.


Let me put it to you again in plain and simple English. PAS is contesting
only 60 Parliament seats. They need 150 seats to control two-thirds of
Parliament. PAS cannot implement Islamic laws even if they control
two-thirds of the seats in the State Assembly without controlling
two-thirds of Parliament. PAS is not pursuing the ISD any longer.
Malaysia will remain a Secular State unless two-thirds of Malaysians
demand this country be changed into an Islamic State through a referendum
-- but then the referendum can only be called by Barisan Nasional and
never by PAS because only Barisan Nasional controls two-thirds of
Parliament.
Now, are we still worried about Malaysia being turned into an Islamic
State? If we are then we had better watch Barisan Nasional closely
because only Barisan Nasional can do that. Look at this news item again
(Pro-government Islamic groups demanding stronger role for Islam ahead of
polls in Malaysia) and here (PEMBELA declaration & press statement ). See
who is crying out for more Islamisation? Is it PAS? Or is it the Umno-led
organisations? And who will control two-thirds of Parliament come this
election? Will it be PAS when it is contesting only 60 seats and may end
up winning only half or so? Or will it be Barisan Nasional as most of you
believe will happen? Is it wise, therefore, that Barisan Nasional be given
two-thirds of the seats in Parliament? You decide come 8 March 2008 when
you go to cast your votes.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail has been sent via JARING webmail at http://www.jaring.my

BELASUNGKAWA - AS SAHIBUS SAMAHAH DATO SHEIKH AZMI

B E L A S U N G K A W A
3 Mac 2008

"Setiap yang bernyawa pasti akan merasai mati"

Dengan penuh dukacita dimaklumkan bahawa Dato Sheikh Azmi telah kembali ke
Rahmatullah pagi tadi. Setelah menjalani pelbagai kaedah rawatan untuk
mengubati sakit yang beliau hidapi, menampakkan kepada kita bahawa
sehingga ke saat akhir, beliau terus gigih berikhtiar meneruskan
kehidupan ini. Pemergian ini merupakan satu kehilangan kepada ummah dan
kita mendoakan agar beliau berada didalam pemeliharaan ALlah dan
ditempatkan dikalangan salafus soleh.

Pengorbanan al marhum kepada perjuangan tiada tolok bandingnya, disaat
almarhum menyandang jawatan sebagai Ketua Hakim Mahkamah Syariah WP, demi
menyatakan perasaan tidak senangnya kepada pemerintah yang zalim, almarhum
sedia melepaskan jawatannya tanpa sebarang "backup" untuk dirinya dan
keluarga.

Sumbangan almarhum dalam membantu gerakan anti murtad akan terus dikenang
dan pastinya ditulis dengan tinta emas sepanjang perjalanan almarhum
menemui Rabbnya kelak.

Selamat jalan as sheikh, kami pasti menyusul tika tiba masa dan saatnya
nanti.

Al Fatihah.


MOHD SHAHRULAZILAN SAID
SU ADAT

----------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail has been sent via JARING webmail at http://www.jaring.my

Percukaian Dalam Negara Kebajikan

Agenda Negara Kebajikan
Percukaian Dalam Negara Kebajikan

Adalah begitu tidak tepat menyebut bahawa Negara Kebajikan adalah negara
bercukai tinggi, sebaliknya Negara Kebajikan adalah negara bercukai adil.
Di Malaysia sistem percukaiannya sememangnya tidak adil sehingga fenomena
golongan kaya bertambah-tambah kaya, manakala golongan miskin
bertambah-tambah miskin. Berdasarkan laporan Malaysian Business tentang
senarai golongan terkaya, 40 orang terkaya di Malaysia memegang aset
sebanyak RM162.66 bilion. Jika dibandingkan dengan anggaran GDP Malaysia
2007 sebanyak RM 1152.5 bilion, maka aset 40 golongan terkaya di Malaysia
ini adalah sekitar 14 % daripada pendapatan negara. Jurang pemisahan kaya
miskin seperti ini merupakan faktor yang kritikal boleh menyebabkan
ketidakstabilan dalam negara.

Dalam sebuah Negara Kebajikan struktur percukaian dilaksanakan untuk
memberi keadilan kepada rakyat keseluruhan di samping tidak menghalang
golongan kaya meneruskan kegiatan ekonomi mereka. Prinsip yang utama
dalam konteks sistem percukaian dalam sebuah Negara Kebajikan ialah
percukaian yang adil dan saksama. Prinsip percukaian seperti ini
diterjemahkan melalui agenda-agenda percukaian seperti berikut:

1. Mengenakan cukai perseorangan berdasarkan taraf hidup yang diukur
dengan kayu ukur yang munasabah. Kayu ukur ini seharusnya dikaji dari
masa ke semasa supaya benar-benar menepati situasi sebenar taraf hidup
rakyat. Dalam ekonomi Islam sistem zakat menunjukkan satu kaedah yang
praktikal apabila kadar nisah harta kekayaan itu berpandukan kepada nilai
emas yang sentiasa berubah. Bagi golongan terkaya potongan cukai mereka
adalah lebih tinggi tetapi tidaklah sehingga mereka dizalimi.

2. Mengelakkan cukai yang bertindih melalui sistem pungutan cukai yang
disatukan. Dengan cara ini akan mengelakkan rakyat terbeban dengan
pelbagai cukai yang sebenarnya tidak perlu dikenakan sekiranya pengurusan
itu disatukan. Sebagai contoh di Malaysia, cukai pintu yang dikutip oleh
pihak berkuasa tempatan tidak melibatkan cukai pembentungan sedangkan ia
boleh disatukan sekiranya tidak berlaku penswatsaan kepada sistem
pembentungan tersebut. Demikian juga dalam sektor pengangkutan, rakyat
dikenakan cukai jalan dan pada masa yang sama dikenakan cukai (tol)
semasa kereta berjalan di Lebuhraya.

3. Meminimakan cukai kepada barangan keperluan asasi dan memaksimakan
cukai kepada barangan aksesori mewah. Dengan pelaksanaan dasar seperti
ini maka dengan sendirinya barangan keperluan asas dapat dibeli dengan
lebih murah sebaliknya sejumlah pendapatan dapat dikutip daripada
golongan berada apabila mereka membeli barangan-barangan mewah. Sebagai
contoh sebarang bentuk cukai atau duti perlu diminimakan bagi rakyat yang
hendak membeli rumah pertama kerana itu adalah keperluan asasi mereka,
tetapi apabila ada rakyat mula membeli rumah kedua dan ketiga maka cukai
maksima yang berpatutan boleh dikenakan.

4. Mengelakkan cukai berulang kepada barangan-barangan terpakai yang
digunakan semula demi mengalakkan penggunaan sumber secara berhemah.
Sebagai contoh apabila seseorang hendak menjual apa sahaja barangan yang
bercukai semasa dibeli dahulu, kegiatan penjualannya dan pendapatan
daripada jualannya dikecualikan cukai. Dasar seperti ini sebenarnya
memberi ruang kepada rakyat yang tidak berada untuk memiliki barangan
mewah dengan harga yang murah dan berkualiti walaupun barangan itu dalam
kategori barangan terpakai.

5. Mewujudkan sistem pengembalian lebih cukai kepada rakyat seperti
menurunkan kadar cukai pada tahun kewangan berikutnya apabila
perbelanjaan tahunan kerajaan menunjukkan lebihan. Sebagai contoh pihak
Kerajaan Tempatan seperti Majlis Bandaraya Shah Alam (MBSA) menurunkan
kadar cukai pintu pada tahun 2008 setelah perbelanjaan MBSA pada tahun
2007 menunjukkan lebihan. Yang berlaku di Malaysia kesemua sektor awam
akan cuba menghabiskan peruntukan kewangan tahunannya sebelum tahun baru
sehingga kadang-kadang berlaku pembaziran seperti deligasi melancong,
majlis makan malam dan lain-lain. Kesemua pembaziran ini sepatutnya tidak
berlaku kerana ia melibatkan wang pembayar cukai.

6. Yang paling penting ialah golongan pembayar cukai mempunyai akses untuk
mengetahui ke mana hasil kutipan cukai mereka dibelanjakan sama ada pihak
Kerajaan Pusat, Kerajaan Tempatan dan lain-lainnya. Perkara yang
terpenting dalam aspek ini ialah golongan pembayar cukai diberi hak untuk
mengetahui maklumat yang telus tentang perbelanjaan hasil pungutan cukai
mereka. Sehubungan dengan itu perlu ada badan bebas sama ada media atau
sivil society yang boleh menyalurkan maklumat perbelanjaan hasil cukai
ini.

Melalui pelaksanaan dasar percukaian seperti ini, maka adalah tidak tepat
tanggapan bahawa dalam sebuah Negara Kebajikan cukai yang dikutip akan
melambung tinggi, sebaliknya kemungkinan kadar cukai itu akan lebih
rendah. Yang penting sistem percukaian adalah satu wasilah untuk
mewujudkan sebuah pentadbiran yang bersih, telus dan amanah. Hari ini
Malaysia merupakan antara negara yang mengenakan cukai yang agak tinggi,
tetapi menafaat yang diperolehi rakyat hasil pungutan cukai sangat
minima. Berlaku ketirisan yang amat sangat terhadap hasil pungutan cukai,
sedangkan golongan pembayar cukai dinafikan hak mereka untuk mengetahui ke
mana hasil cukai mereka dibelanjakan.

Cakap Tak Serupa Bikin
Kelantan Election News Kelantan BN pledges to reduce taxes

In the supplementary manifesto for the state, BN is pledging to lower
assessment rates and quit rent, and abolish minor taxes on petty traders.

These are among the pledges in Kelantan Barisan Nasional's supplementary
manifesto to be unveiled tomorrow.

State BN chief Datuk Seri Annuar Musa said the manifesto would not only
address the needs and problems of the rakyat but also focus on good
governance.

"Sometimes the thinking that raising taxes would fatten the state coffers
is not right. Instead, we must be creative."

He said the manifesto would not only offer mega, iconic projects like the
new state mosque and stadium, it would also touch on the daily issues
which had direct impact on the people, especially the lower income group.


Analysis:

Do you believe this? I don't! Look at every state which is under the
control of Barisan Nasional.

Look at Selangor who had raise the assessment tax and quit rent over the
last 4 years. The state had in fact added a few more other taxes to
increase the state revenue in view of the overspending by the councillors
who made overseas trip to study toilet in Mauritius, watch belly dancing
in Egypt and visited toilets in China.

Look at Terengganu; the BN took control of the state 4 years ago and did
you hear of any quit rent and assessment tax being lowered? If they can't
do this for the states they are in control, how then? They may do it in
Kelantan to fulfill their promise, only to be creatively reconstructed
the tax in another form or structure. PAS vice president Datuk Husam Musa
said the Barisan Nasional wanted to capture Kelantan because of the oil
supply base off Kuala Besar and a natural gas landing terminal near the
JDA area. The oil reserves on the PM301 Block could last seven
generations and bring huge development funds to Kelantan.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail has been sent via JARING webmail at http://www.jaring.my

An Open Letter - Appeal for a better Parliament

An Open Letter - Appeal for a better Parliament
Wednesday, 27 February 2008 10:59am

Dear Fellow Malaysians,

It is true that there are things that we Malaysians should be proud of,
and be thankful for. It is equally true that many things are not well in
our country. They have not been well for some time now. Matters of safety
and security, price hikes, education, issues of equal opportunities and
equal treatment, constriction of various forms of freedom,
marginalisation of several segments of society, the failing justice
system, corruption in the public sector, the rising denial syndromes, the
arrogance of wrongdoers nourished by their repeated ability to get off
scot-free, and the numbness of the public reaction towards misdeeds and
the lack of accountability, just to describe a few.
Many of the ills that we complain about in our society are the symptoms
of the underlying causes. Some of the major root causes are: (a) epidemic
corruption in a system that does little to prohibit or redress it, (b)
lack of a system of transparency and accountability, (c) the suppression
of various freedoms so as to turn a silent majority into a silenced
majority, (d) a Government that is more interested in commanding than
serving, (e) a Parliament whose overwhelming majority cares more about
power-consolidation than nation-building, and (f) a weak "last bastion"
in the form of a failing justice system.

Can things be allowed to go on this way? Can we afford to do so? Should
our future generations suffer the consequences of our permissiveness?

It is quite obvious that we need a better Government and a better
Parliament.

But that will not happen if we, the citizens of Malaysia, do little more
than blaming the Government and criticizing our Members of Parliament. It
is we who put our MPs in the Parliament. It is we who must take the
ultimate responsibility. The buck stops at each and every one of us.

My earnest appeal to everyone is therefore as follows:

(i) discuss the need for a better Parliament and a better Government, with
your family members, colleagues, friends and persons close to you;

(ii) make it a point to go and vote in the next election, and to vote for
change and for betterment;

(iii) discard the notion or excuse that your single vote will not matter;

(iv) discard the notion or excuse that politics is dirty and all
politicians are the same, and therefore that there is no point in voting;

(v) influence and encourage as many of your family members, colleagues,
friends and persons close to you as possible, to come out and vote for
change and for betterment in the coming election.

It is meaningless for us to complain about our Parliamentarians and the
Government, if we do not first discharge a simple but sacrosanct duty of
choice.

Let us all take the time to look into the beautiful but expectant eyes of
our children, and of the children of many others for whom we care. The
future of our nation is meant for them. But millions of them cannot vote.
They put their fate in our hands. They rely on us not just for their
present living and support. They rely on us, too, to vote for a better
future for them.

And after discharging our duty to vote, we must continue to be vigilant,
and ensure that our elected representatives account for their actions,
and make good their promises.

I humbly suggest to you that change and betterment are not empty dreams,
if all of us play our respective parts. I invite you, and I urge you, to
answer my appeal as set out above.

Thank you.

Yours sincerely,

Yeo Yang Poh
Advocate & Solicitor,
& a concerned Malaysian


----------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail has been sent via JARING webmail at http://www.jaring.my

Anwar vows to dismantle race policies

M'sia's Anwar vows to dismantle race policies
Feb 26, 2008

KUALA LUMPUR - MALAYSIA'S opposition figurehead Anwar Ibrahim vowed on
Tuesday to end race-based discrimination policies, lower fuel prices and
fight corruption in a policy manifesto ahead of Mar 8 polls.

Anwar, who was deputy prime minister until being sacked and jailed in
1998,
said long-running policies favouring majority Malays had only benefited
cronies of the ruling United Malays National Organisation (Umno).

'The New Economic Policy has been abused to enrich the family of Umno
leaders and their cronies,' said Mr Anwar who is campaigning for the
Keadilan formally led by his wife.

'If you really want to deal with the issue of poverty, why can't we just
say
we have an affirmative action policy helping the poor and the
marginalised. '

'It should not be racially based.'

Malaysia has pursued an affirmative action programme for Malays and
indigenous groups known as 'bumiputras' since the 1970s to close a wealth
gap with the minority Chinese community.

However, it has been criticised for failing to pull a large number of
Muslim
Malays out of poverty, and of ignoring the minority ethnic Indian
community,
which is also disadvantaged.

The manifesto entitled 'A New Dawn for Malaysia,' centred on battling
rising
inflation, which has triggered public anger and rare public protests as
the
prices of food and fuel edge higher.

Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi has said the government cannot afford
to continue spending 43.4 billion ringgit (S$19 billion) annually to
subsidise essential items.

Mr Anwar, who was heir apparent in 1998 to then-premier Mahathir Mohamad,
spent six years in jail on sex and corruption charges. The sex charge was
overturned but the corruption count bars him from taking public office
until
April.

His wife has said she will stand aside to make way for Mr Anwar to contest
her seat in a by-election after the March polls, in a plan that could see
him return to parliament within months.

Mr Anwar said Mr Abdullah was 'in denial' over the state of the economy.

'Keadilan promises to lower the price of petrol ... as well as manage the
prices of basic goods to ensure a consistent supply. Tolls and tariffs
will
also no longer be raised,' he said.

Keadilan has forged a loose alliance with two other opposition parties who
have agreed to stand just one candidate against the government in each
constituency, avoiding damaging three-cornered contests.

The opposition hopes that gripes over inflation, rising crime rates and
mounting ethnic tensions will enable it to reduce the government's
thumping
majority below two-thirds for the first time in history. -- AFP


----------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail has been sent via JARING webmail at http://www.jaring.my

Petronas turns into an election issue

Petronas turns into an election issue
February 26, 2008

Questions pertaining to the usage of Petronas' coffers to placate the
ruling government's mega projects came into the limelight during
campaigning in the country's 12th general election.


PKR deputy president Dr Syed Husin Ali queried the continuing use of the
national oil producer's profits to finance Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad
Badawi's mega projects. He also urged the government to stop abusing
Petronas' profits.


"Beginning from the previous prime minister (Dr Mahathir Mohamad)
unnecessary projects which do not benefit the nation have been funded by
Petronas' profits," he said in a statement.


He said Abdullah, who promised to end the practice of using Petronas
money for mega projects, had also reneged on his promise.

For the financial year ended March 31, 2007, Petronas posted a net
profit of RM46.4 billion, up 7.7 percent. Revenue was up 10 percent
(RM184.1 billion) while shareholders' fund rose 16.3 percent to RM170.9
billion.


In terms of payment to the government, Petronas contributed RM52.3
billion or 66.2 percent of its profit as tax, dividends, royalties and
export duties. Over the past 33 years, a total of RM336 billion was
contributed to the government.


Net importer
Petronas president and CEO Mohd Hassan Merican, however, warned that
Malaysia would become a net importer of oil by 2010 if consumption growth
continued at four percent per annum.


The company itself was also concerned over the subsidy it was handing
out. For the year 2007, it forked out a total of RM15.6 billion. Total
subsidy since gas prices were fixed in 1997 now stood at RM58.2 billion.


Some of the "national" projects Petronas had undertaken since 1997
include funding the Formula One races and the Sauber racing team, Twin
Towers, and Putrajaya.


Petronas funds were also used to bail out Bank Bumiputera in the 1980s
and the buying of debt-laden Konsortium Perkapalan Bhd Malaysian during
the Asian financial crisis in 1998.


Incidentally, Mahathir's son Mirzan owned KPB (which had debts of RM1.7
billion) at the time.


----------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail has been sent via JARING webmail at http://www.jaring.my

In 2004, Morgan Stanley issued a report that estimated that over 100
Billion
US Dollars (360 Billion Ringgit) had been lost to Malay patronage in the
20
years preceding 2003. (1984 to 2003) One economist estimates that in the
36
years of its' existence, the NEP has been used to channel over ONE
TRILLION
RINGGIT to the Malay community through ASN, ASB and other related Govt
policies.

Since 1970, the Govt has used the NEP to divert education, employment and
every other conceivable benefit to the Malays. These measures have largely
been successful with all the top posts in GLCs, Government, Universities,
Public listed companies and practically every single area that the Govt
has
any control over being reserved for one race. No company may be listed
with
a lower than 30% Bumi equity but there is absolutely no problem if it is
otherwise. Some industries have a mandatory 51% Bumi ownership and some
industries are reserved exclusively for them. Petronas for example only
employs Malays for it's top managerial and executive positions and awards
contracts only to Malays.

ALL Govt and Municipal contracts are reserved to class "F" Bumi
contractors.
All the proposed projects under the 9th Malaysia Plan thus far are
reserved
for 100% Bumi owned companies. Even open tender projects are awarded to
Malays even if their prices are higher with blatantly inferior materials.
Micro business loans, business licenses, discounts on property purchases,
new Govt employment, EVEN LICENSES FOR HAWKER STALLS are reserved for one
race. The list goes on and on but the summary is that the Malays now
believes undoubtedly that he is racially privileged and it is their right
ASLI's figures of 45% are opposed to the Govt's 18.9% because, firstly,
equity value is calculated at par value. For example, if you hold 1,000
Maxis shares of RM 5/- market value each, the Govt
says that it is only worth RM 250.00 as these shares have a par value of
25
cents each. If you owned a company with a paid up value of RM 2/- but
conducted business worth millions of Ringgit worth of transactions, the
Govt
values that company at RM 2/-.

The chief setbacks of the abuses of the NEP are rampant corruption and
more
cronyism, worsening racial polarization, unrelenting brain drains, warped
educational system, thwarted economic competitiveness, ineffectual
bureaucracy, retarded economic growth and perverted social values. Such
anachronistic and regressive policy has no place in the present
globalizing
world, and for that matter, in any civilized society.

PM Badawi recently intensified the imprint of the perverted NEP philosophy
by prohibiting inter-religious and inter-racial discourse which would
otherwise have contributed to greater understanding and
harmony among the races. Consider the hegemony this has created.

The Jasin MP's saga of cheating millions from Customs over timber imports
went unpunished. APs are reserved for Bumis only and despite the millions
that each of them make year after year, a senator's son has the audacity
to
clone the APs several times and the whole thing gets swept under the
carpet.
A Port Klang councilor buys a 43,000 sq ft plot of land set aside for low
cost housing valued at 1.8 million Ringgit for 180k and builds a palace
without any approval. He gets fined RM 5,000 and still has 30 days from
today to submit his building plans. Yesterday, despite all the bad press
this issue got, the Selangor state Govt confirms his position and that of
his son and daughter in law as councilors. The message is clear. Power has
shifted from the people to the executive.

The whole issue of Bumi chauvinism started at last year's UMNO assembly
when
the very very vocal UMNO Youth leaders stated in short that "It's our turn
to be rich." This greed is not going to end. We as a nation of loyal
citizens have to put a dent into this rubbish for the sake of our
children.

We don't need a change in Govt.
We need a stronger Opposition.
We need to send a message to the powers that be that we will not accept
second class status for our children.

Colin Nathan
(A Concerned Malaysian)


----------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail has been sent via JARING webmail at http://www.jaring.my

Is Anwar Ibrahim Irrelevant?

Tue, 19 Feb 2008 11:02:28 +0800
Subject: Is Anwar Ibrahim Irrelevant?

The most famous term used by BN leaders is Dato' Seri Anwar Ibrahim
(DSAI) is irrelevant, is this true? I was beginning to believe that
maybe their claim was justified as it was being mentioned repeatedly
over the months until I had personally attended his Ceramah at
Buntong and Dewan Tow Bee Keong in Ipoh on the 11-1-08 between 7.30-11pm.

There were banners displayed at several places around Ipoh for a
Chinese New Year celebration with DSAI at Dewan Tow Bee Keong, so a
crowd of 5,000, mostly Chinese did not take me by surprise. However,
a crowd of more than 5,000 people at Buntong with a days notice and
organizing it at a small terrace house, with no stage was an eye
opener. So why was there such a large crowd? Why an "irrelevant"
person able to create such hype.

The mere presence of Anwar Ibrahim created euphoria, his aura was
immense, I was 50 meters away from him but I could feel the vibe, the
urge to pay close attention to what he was going to say, he was a
born LEADER. It's just like walking into a temple with strong
vibration where you feel the sense of calmness and serenity. Anwar is
definitely relevant!!!

He did not scream all the way as most politician do, but there was
pin drop silence when his tone of voice was soft, I mean pin drop
silence amongst the Buntong crowd! He kept the crowd cheering and
laughing all the way throughout his hour long speech. He was
instantly a big hit amongst the Buntong crowd. He received the same
ovation at Dewan Tow Bee Keong as well.

So what were the issues addressed and why should we vote for any

opposition party whether its KEADILAN, DAP or PAS.

1. Rising price of oil and all essential goods.

He insists that petrol price would be reduced immediately once he is

PM. In contrast, Najib claims that the country would become bankrupt

if this was done, so how would it be possible. Simple, presently

PETRONAS annual profit after tax is RM80 billion, take RM 10 billion

from it and further subsidize the petrol would not have any material

effect on the government revenue as we are an oil exporting nation.

During his 8 year tenure as Finance Minister and Deputy Prime

Minister, oil was kept at RM1.10/litre when profits from Petronas was

between RM 25 – 30 billion annually. Remember that most robust

projects were also undertaken during this period but we never went

buzz. After his sacking in September 1998, petrol rose in October

1998 and tol rates rose in November 1998.

2. Free education from primary to tertiary education.

Hah! Bolehkah ini? Mana boleh? Well, another RM 10 billion would do

from Petronas profit, simple as that. When you can manage with RM 30

billion, why can't you manage with RM 60 billion from Petronas. He

says that this is God given gift to the people, at least half of

which should go back to the people in some way or rather. What is the

point of the nation being rich yet the rakyat being poor?

3. Racial tension like never before

Why so much misconception between races, we are all Malaysians. The

annual government revenue is RM 200 billion, to a population of 27

million is one the highest in the world, so there is no need to

quarrel, we all can share the cake. So where is the problem, the bulk

of the cake is being gobbled by few BN component leaders and leaving

the poor rakyat to feel that we are being robbed by the other race.

Morgan Stanley reported than corruption has cost the nation RM 100

billion since 2004. So please, let's unite and fight the true enemy,

please pass this important message to as many as possible, because as

election draws closer, and if BN is on the verge of defeat, they may

just stir this sentiment as they have done in the past while we fall

victims.

4. Brain drain and lack of opportunities

Many non-Bumis are with the perception that they are being deprived

of tertiary education even after obtaining the best possible results,

true. But who are the true beneficiaries, remember that only 30% of

the Bumis are either professionals or some how benefited from the

growth of the country or somehow is a crony to some prominent

individuals. They are the ones able to give their children quality

secondary education and they are the ones who have most benefited

from government scholarships and tertiary education. The remaining

70% of Bumis are still neglected and aren't given much opportunity

just as the non-Bumis.

He promised to help the most deserving Bumis (70% who are still poor)

and the most deserving non-Bumis from tertiary education to

government job employment.

5. Chinese and Tamil schools

He vowed to make all schools as fully government aided schools if

keADILan was to come to power. I wouldn't want to repeat the

financial means as I've already done so.

6. Fear of PAS or DAP

This is BN propaganda, PAS is contesting in 60 seats and DAP even

less, neither party on its own can come to power. Fear is put amongst

non-Muslims that PAS are too radical, likewise DAP are a communist

organization. Neither is true, 75% of non-muslims vote in Kelantan in

the 2004 election went to PAS, there must be something right with PAS

and something not so right with BN for people resorting to choose

PAS. Lim Guan Eng served 2 years in jail protecting an underaged

Malay girl who was having an affair with a top UMNO leader. Are they

communist?

Anyway, keADILan would have to win the most number of seats with PAS

and DAP making up the numbers for them to govern. So, please do not

fear PAS or DAP. Either they would be ideal oppositions in parliament

or a coalition party in a keADILan led multiracial government.

Likewise many other issues were addressed. Now the big question is,

can Anwar be trusted? Well, how much worst can he be compared to the

current leaders. Is there any credible leader in UMNO who can turn

this country around? Petrol price is to increase again in April '08.

All essential goods are going to go higher. Malaysia's Foreign Direct

Investment (pelaburan asing) has dwindled from top spot in the 90's

to 6th in 2007 after Singapore, Vietnam, Indonesia, Thailand and

Philippines in South East Asia. Anwar is a leading financial adviser

to many large institution and businessman for investment

opportunities in South East Asia. University ranking has dropped

below 200 wherelse Univeristy of Singapore are No.3 in Asia and

Indian Institute of Tech. are top 10 in the world. Anwar is currently

serves as a professor in Harvard and Oxford Universities, needless

for me to say about the reputation of these two top class

universities.

With all these in mind, why can't we give him 5 years to prove

himself. We have prejudged him as untrustworthy, well, he was in

UMNO, to be a leader in UMNO, you must be a fanatic Malay, likewise

MCA and MIC because they are race based parties. Now he has formed a

multiracial party to fight for all regardless of race and religion

but promised to protect the Malay rights as stipulated in the

constitution. It's TIME FOR CHANGE. VOTE WISELY.


----------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail has been sent via JARING webmail at http://www.jaring.my

Beberapa cadangan untuk banner/sepanduk

'The War' akan berlangsung 8 Mac ini. 'Peperangan' yang tentunya akan
menyaksikan pelbagai rentak serangan, hentaman dan sanggahan. Faktor
langit tentunya faktor utama, tetapi yang berperang tetap
dipertanggungjawab untuk mencari strategi.

PRU kali ini cukup penting. BN yang memerintah sudah cukup parah dengan
keKORUPannya. Tetapi untuk mengekalkan kuasanya, mereka akan menggunakan
segala cara supaya menang-by hook or by crook. Teori Machevelli 'matlamat
menghalalkan cara' menjadi moto penting.

Buat masa sekarang, media sedang digunakan untuk membuat provokasi
habis-habisan terhadap parti lawan. Halal haram , betul salah bukan
ukuran. Yang penting ialah MENANG.

PAS dan PKR punya isu dalam negara cukup banyak. Dari sistem kehakiman
hinggalah ke JKK. Tinggal lagi bagaimana menggarap isu-isu itu dalam
bentuk paling baik supaya ia sampai ke peringkat grassroot.

Banner, sepanduk, risalah, handbill di antara yang cukup penting selain
e-mail dan sms. Beberapa tips untuk bahan kempen ini ialah:
- isu mesti utama, bukan yang remeh-temeh.
-Isu mesti spesifik, berfokus.
-Ayat mesti ringkas, tepat dan padat.
-Gunakan huruf besar yang diprint, bukan tulisan tangan yang
menyerabutkan.
-jangan syok sendiri, tumpu kepada isu rakyat umum, bukannya hanya isu
yang diketahui oleh ahli PAS sahaja.
-hindarkan ulasan isu yang boleh menikam PAS atau PKR kembali.
-isu biar 'mengancam', boleh guna reverse psychology
-gantung banner, sepanduk di tempat strategi, mudah dilihat, senang dibaca
oleh semua.

Contoh-contoh ayat yang boleh digunakan:

'Laporan Ketua Audit Negara: Bukti BN tak layak perintah negara'

'(Gambar Dacing senget) Rakyat diSOGOK RM300 4 tahun sekali (satu neraca),
Pemimpin BN KEBAS RM3 juta 4 kali setahun (di satu neraca lagi)'

'Undilah BN, harga minyak akan dinaikkan lagi, (Berapa kali nak naik
daa..)'

'Fikirkan nasib anak cucu anda sebelum undi BN'

'Apa wakil rakyat BN kawasan anda buat?'

'BN menang, toke senang, rakyat tunggang langgang'

'Undilah BN untuk terus memeras rakyat'

'Dapat RM300, belanja 4 hari, rugi 4 tahun'

'Bala turun kerana tolak hukum Allah'

'18 tahun PAS perintah Kelantan, bukti PAS boleh!'

'1999-2004 PAS perintah Terengganu: Macam-macam kita buat'


----------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail has been sent via JARING webmail at http://www.jaring.my