Monday, February 22, 2010

Exposing Our Leaders To Competition

Exposing Our Leaders to Competition
M. Bakri Musa
www.bakrimusa.com

The recent installation of Tunku Muhriz as the 11th Yang Di Pertuan Besar
of Negri Sembilan (the equivalent of a sultan in the other states)
illustrates one important point. When the top position is not
automatically handed to the putative Number Two and instead you widen
your choice, you are more likely to end up with a far superior candidate.

The consensus among the rakyat as well as the establishment is
that Tunku Muhriz is a far superior candidate, and a better person to
boot, than the other contenders, the three sons of Tuanku Jaafar.

It is too late for the three adult sons of Tuanku Jaafar to
appreciate and benefit from the wisdom of my observation. It is hard to
learn as an adult the lessons you should have learned as a youngster.

Tunku Naquiyuddin, Tuanku Jaafar's oldest son, must have felt
the sting the most. After all, his father had named him Regent, or
acting Yam Tuan, during his recent extended overseas tour. As such
Naquiyuddin must have felt that the throne would rightly be his. He had
already begun acting as the Yam Tuan, as he did recently when he called
for the restoration of the Sultans' absolute royal immunity. At the
personal level, he was already behaving only too well as a feudal king.

As for Tunku Muhriz, he had learned his lesson well, and
early, way back in 1967 when the Undangs (Territorial Chiefs) instead
bypassed him to pick his father's half-brother Tuanku Jaafar as the 10th
Yam Tuan to succeed Tunku Muhriz's father. Sensing that the royal throne
would not be his, he wisely prepared himself for life in the real world
outside the palace. By all measures he has done well, having obtained a
law degree and acquitting himself credibly in the private sector.

More importantly, he has also imparted those valuable lessons
onto his children. They too have all done well academically and
personally san their royal titles, making their achievements that much
more credible and praiseworthy.


The Badawi Disaster

The wisdom of my observation is universal. Note the disaster when Deputy
Prime Minister Abdullah Badawi automatically assumed the top slot upon
the retirement of Dr. Mahathir. Had Mahathir been aware of the wisdom of
my observation and widened the choice of candidates to succeed him,
<?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns =
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" />Malaysia would have been
spared the incompetence of Abdullah Badawi.

This pattern of the number two automatically becoming number
one is rampant if not standard practice in the civil service. Those
senior civil servants behave like airplanes stacked at a busy airport,
each patiently waiting his turn and not daring to upset the established
pattern lest it would threaten his position and prospect.

I have seen this pattern broken only rarely, as in the early
1960s when Dr. Majid Ismail, then an orthopedic consultant, was tapped to
be the Director-General of Health, bypassing many senior bureaucrats. He
upset the entire hierarchy at the Ministry of Health; Majid later proved
himself to be one of the most farsighted and enlightened health
policymakers. Today that Ministry remains one of the few that do not hew
to the strict "tunggu geleran" (waiting your turn) pattern of the civil
service. It is thus not a surprise that it is one of the more
professionally-run ministries.

Come this March with the current Number Two Najib Razak
automatically assuming the Number One position with Abdullah's leaving
office, Malaysia risks repeating the same mistake. There will be no
contest to select the best candidate for the top slot for in its wisdom
UMNO has adopted rules and traditions that stymied competition especially
for the top post.

Prior to his elevation to the throne, Tunku Muhriz had the
title of Tuanku Besar. Though its literal translation ("Big King") is
misleading, nonetheless in Negri Sembilan the Raja Besar is equivalent to
a Raja Muda, the Crown Prince or heir apparent in other states. That did
not help him when his father Tunku Munawir died in 1967; the four Undangs
in their wisdom bypassed Tunku Muhriz. Nor did that help him with the
late Tuanku Jaafar for he named his son Tunku Naquiyuddin instead as
Regent.

The public reason given back in 1967 for bypassing Tunku
Muhriz was that he was too young – he was only 18 then – to be the Yang
Di Pertuan Besar. Additionally, the political establishment then led by
Prime Minister Tunku Abdul Rahman lobbied the Undangs hard for Tuanku
Jaafar, believing that he (and his family) would be sympathetic to UMNO.

Whatever the reasons, the Undangs' decision was well received,
especially by the villagers. They wisely noted that Tunku Munawir died at
the relatively young age of 47 from what we would term today as "lifestyle
diseases." They were concerned that the young Tunku Muhriz would follow
in his father's footsteps, in the village tradition of bapak burek, anak
rentik (fig: Like father, like son).

As it turned out, Tunku Muhriz was anything but like his
father, both in personality and accomplishments. Nevertheless like many,
I do not fault the Undangs for their decision back in 1967. By any
objective criterion, it was a wise pick, considering that Tuanku Jaafar
was a British-trained diplomat while Tunku Muhriz was barely out of high
school then.

Today's Undangs are a far different breed from their
predecessors of a mere generation ago. The position of Undang is also
hereditary but not in a strict linear fashion, just like that of the Yam
Tuan. The various clan chiefs would gather and pick from among the many
entitled to be Undang, just as the Undangs would pick the Yam Tuan from
among the many eligible princes. A primordial form of democracy and
representative government, as it were.

Following my theory, the caliber of Undangs should improve
because of the competition among the eligible contenders. Yet we have
the perverse situation today where the present generation of Undangs
being even more poorly educated and of lower caliber than their
predecessors. While a generation ago we had a lawyer and a university
graduate among the Undangs, today we have a former utility meter reader
and a petai seller.

The erosion in the caliber of today's Undangs is of course
directly related to, like everything else in Malaysia, corruption. Yet
despite that, today's Undangs were able to collectively come to a wise
decision. The erosion in quality and integrity of individual Undangs
notwithstanding, the institution itself was able to deliver a wise
decision. This demonstrates the vital role of institutions. Imagine how
much good these Undangs would do for society if only they were more
competent and less corrupt.

The aberration that is today's Undangs remains the exception
that proves my theory. Nonetheless what is relevant is that because we
have the institution and process in place, the right decision was made,
those deficiencies in personnel notwithstanding.


Najib's Dangerous Mindset

The experience with the Negri Sembilan royal selection process illustrates
the wisdom of exposing our leaders to continuous competition, and of
having the right institutions and processes in place to ensure that.
That is the best if not only way to hold these leaders accountable. The
biggest mistake would be to make them "President for Life" or heap some
such similar honors upon them. Such excessive accolades are what
corrupted otherwise sensible leaders. Even once wise and patriotic
leaders like Sukarno ultimately succumbed to and became a tyrant simply
because he was not held accountable or subjected to rigorous checks and
balances.

UMNO once had the fine tradition where its leaders were
routinely subjected to regular challenges. Even such venerable leaders
as Bapak Merdeka Tunku Abdul Rahman were not spared. Today we look
askance at such once brave figures as Sulaiman Palestin who would not
hesitate to challenge any leader regardless how popular that leader was
at the time. In contrast, today's UMNO leaders are given a free pass,
all in the misguided quest for "party unity."

However, only through such constant competitions could we
"toughen up" our leaders. During the recent American Presidential
primary season, many members of the Democratic Party were upset that
Candidate Hilary Clinton would not give up her race earlier and let the
leading candidate Barrack Obama be the nominee sooner. As it turned out,
the long primary was beneficial to Obama as it toughened him up such that
he could easily withstand the subsequent onslaughts from his Republican
opponent.

UMNO is making a terrible mistake in letting Najib Razak take
over the top slot without subjecting him to a tough campaign. Such
grueling leadership competitions are necessary for "baptizing" a leader.
It would help sharpen his leadership skills as well as let party members
and voters preview his abilities.

Because he was not subjected to any competition, Najib Razak
now feels that the country owes him the Prime Minister's office by virtue
of his being the son of the much-revered Tun Razak. That is a dangerous
mindset for anyone, especially a leader, to have. Ultimately it is the
citizens who would bear the burden of such hubris in our leaders.

The many effusive comments about Tunku Muhriz would not easily
go this head. Having once been bypassed for the top slot, Tunku Muhriz is
fully aware that he could only secure his position by doing an excellent
job and by diligently attending to his royal duties. In contrast, Najib
Razak has had an easy ride all along; he has yet to learn this important
lesson.

Malaysiakini.com January 8, 2009

----------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail has been sent via JARING webmail at http://www.jaring.my

No comments: