| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weblog dwibahasa MERDEKA diwujudkan untuk mengetengahkan pandangan, penjelasan dan pemikiran mengenai aspek-aspek penting dalam kehidupan sama ada dari sudut peribadi, keagamaan, kemasyarakatan, kenegaraan dan keantarabangsaan. Ia dilandaskan kepada prinsip dialog secara beradab untuk mencari kebenaran dan dengan kebenaran itu keadilan dapat dibina.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rights group: Burma government 'systematically persecuting' Rohingya
Mark Inkey ("Asian Correspondent," February 25, 2014)
A new report has revealed official Burmese government policies that 'systematically persecute' Rohingya Muslims by denying them basic human rights, including restrictions on movement, marriage, family, health, and privacy.
The report, 'Policies of Persecution: Ending Abusive State Policies Against Rohingya Muslims in Myanmar' by Fortify Rights, a human rights NGO, is based on 12 leaked policy documents, reviews of public records and interviews with Rohingyas in Burma and Thailand.
It claims that official policies are designed to make life so intolerable for the Rohingya that they will leave the country, as many have done in recent years.
Restrictions placed on the Rohingya include restrictions on marriage, childbirth, movement, home repairs and the construction of places of worship. Security forces are also authorized to use abusive measures to enforce these regulations.
"The impacts of these restrictions are severe and have been well-documented for decades, but the official orders have been kept out of the public domain until now," said Matthew Smith, executive director of Fortify Rights, in a statement.
The report publishes eight previously unpublished government documents relating to Rakhine state dating from 1993 to 2008. It also bases findings on four government documents published in March 2013 that relate to Muslims outside Rakhine State. These documents are unpublished due to security concerns.
Despite official denials of such a policy, regional Order 1/2005 limits the number of children Rohingyas can have "in order to control the birth rate so that there is enough food and shelter." It also forbids unmarried Rohingyas from having children.
This law has led to a strict two-child policy since 2005 for Rohingyas in the townships of Maungdaw and Buthidaung in northern Rakhine State and resulted in women having unsafe abortions with serious health consequences, including death.
Another document details restrictions on marriage faced by Rohingya who have to apply for permission to marry, unlike members of other ethnic groups. Rohingyas who want to marry have to pass 10 requirements, a process that is often humiliating and financially prohibitive.
"The government is systematically persecuting Rohingya on the basis of ethnicity, religion, and at times gender," Matthew Smith said. "Rohingya women in particular find themselves in the crosshairs of these targeted policies, facing severe discrimination because they're women as well as Rohingya Muslims."
Other documents detail restrictions on freedom of movement for Rohingyas. They are not allowed to travel within or between townships without authorization and travelling out of state is essentially forbidden as it requires extra authorization which is almost impossible to obtain.
Rohingyas are even forbidden from going to other areas to get essential healthcare, the report reveals.
Other documents obtained by Fortify Rights explicitly provide for criminal punishments, including imprisonment and fines, for any Rohingya who violate the restrictions.
Fortify Rights believe that these restrictions constitute crimes against humanity under the Rome statute. They are calling for an international investigation into human rights abuses, including abusive restrictions, against the Rohingya.
Matthew Smith said: "The reality is that the official state policies and practices against Rohingya are plainly abusive.
"The international community should unequivocally condemn these policies and practices and work with the government of Myanmar [Burma] to ensure they're abolished."
CommentsWASHINGTON, DC – The biggest innovation in energy so far this century has been the development of shale gas and the associated resource known as "tight oil." Shale energy ranks at the top not only because of its abundance in the United States, but also because of its profound global impact – as events in 2014 will continue to demonstrate.
CommentsAmerica's shale gas and tight oil are already changing global energy markets and reducing both Europe's competitiveness vis-Ã -vis the US and China's overall manufacturing competitiveness. They are also bringing shifts in global politics. Indeed, how shale energy may change America's role in the Middle East is becoming a hot topic in Washington, DC, and in the Middle East itself.
CommentsThis "unconventional revolution" in oil and gas did not come quickly. Hydraulic fracturing – known as "fracking" – has been around since 1947, and initial efforts to adapt it to dense shale began in Texas in the early 1980's. But it was not until the late 1990's and early 2000's that the specific type of fracturing for shale, combined with horizontal drilling, was perfected. And it was not until 2008 that its impact on the US energy supply became notable.
CommentsSince then, the industry has developed fast, with shale gas currently accounting for 44% of total US natural-gas production. Given abundant supply, US gas prices have fallen to a third of those in Europe, while Asia pays five times as much. Tight oil, produced with the same technology as shale gas, is boosting US oil production as well, with output up 56% since 2008 – an increase that, in absolute terms, is larger than the total output of each of eight of the 12 OPEC countries. Indeed, the International Energy Agency predicts that in the next few years the US will overtake Saudi Arabia and Russia to become the world's largest oil producer.
CommentsFive years ago, it was expected that the US would be importing large volumes of liquefied natural gas to make up for an anticipated shortfall in domestic production. Now the US is not importing any LNG – thereby saving $100 billion on its annual import bill. At current prices, the increase in US oil production has been cutting another $100 billion from that bill. In addition, the unconventional revolution supports over two million jobs.
CommentsThe global impact has been enormous. Much of the new global LNG capacity was developed with the US in mind. Now, with the US market cordoned off by cheap domestic gas, some of that LNG is going to Europe, introducing unexpected competition for traditional suppliers Russia and Norway.
CommentsFor Japan, the lack of US demand for LNG proved fortunate in the aftermath of the disaster at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear-power plant in 2011. Much of that LNG could go to Japan to generate electricity, replacing the electricity lost from the total shutdown of nuclear power.
CommentsMany other countries are reassessing their own energy policies in light of the unconventional-energy revolution. China, seeing the speed and extent of US shale-gas development, has placed a high priority on developing its extensive unconventional gas resources. For China, replacing coal with natural gas in electricity generation is essential to mitigate public discontent and health problems stemming from the heavy burden of urban air pollution.
CommentsThe rise of US shale energy is also having a broader global economic impact: American shale gas is changing the balance of competitiveness in the world economy, giving the US an unanticipated advantage. Indeed, inexpensive natural gas is fueling a US manufacturing renaissance, as companies build new plants and expand existing facilities.
CommentsThroughout Europe, industrial leaders are becoming increasingly alarmed by enterprises' loss of competitiveness to factories that use low-cost natural gas and the consequent shift of manufacturing from Europe to the US. This is particularly worrying in Germany, which relies on exports for half of its GDP, and where energy costs remain on a stubbornly upward trajectory. These high costs mean that German industry will lose global market share.
CommentsWhatever their targets for shifting their energy mix, European Union countries, already suffering from high unemployment, will be forced to reconsider high-cost energy strategies or face weakening competitiveness and loss of jobs.
CommentsThe geopolitical impact is already evident. For example, Iran is now seriously at the table in nuclear negotiations, which might well not have happened were it not for tight oil. When strict sanctions were imposed on Iranian oil exports, many feared that world oil prices would spike, and that the sanctions would ultimately fail, owing to insufficient alternative supply. But the increase in US oil production over the last two years has more than made up for the missing Iranian output, enabling the sanctions (bolstered by parallel financial measures) to work – impelling Iran to negotiate seriously, which it was unwilling to do only two years ago.
CommentsIn Arab capitals, anxiety is mounting that a rapid increase in US tight-oil production will fuel wholesale US disengagement from the Middle East. But this overstates the extent to which direct oil imports shape US policy toward the region. To be sure, rising US output, combined with greater automotive fuel efficiency, will continue to reduce US oil imports. And, while the US will still import oil in the years ahead, more of it will come from Canada (notwithstanding the debate about the Keystone XL pipeline).
CommentsBut the fact is that Middle East supply has not loomed very large in the overall US petroleum picture for some time. After all, even before the growth of tight oil, the Persian Gulf provided only about 10% of total US supply. It was not direct US oil imports from the Middle East, but rather oil's importance to the global economy and world politics, that helped define US strategic interests.
CommentsThe Middle East will continue to be an arena of great geopolitical importance, and its oil will be essential to the functioning of the global economy. This implies that the region will likely remain a central strategic interest for the US.
CommentsOverall, however, the shale-energy revolution does provide a new source of resilience for the US and enhances America's position in the world. The emergence of shale gas and tight oil in the US demonstrates, once again, how innovation can change the balance of global economic and political power.
DECEMBER 29, 2013
The Malaysian Oil and Gas Services Council (MOGSC) has described as baseless, accusations that Bumiputera companies are being neglected by Petroliam Nasional Bhd (Petronas).
It also described the allegation as mere provocation from those who did not understand how the industry works.
MOGSC president Sofiyan Yahya said such a perception, was also insulting, as it downplayed Bumiputera participation in one of the largest contributors to Malaysia's revenue.
The stakeholding, he added, varied from each field of work, with a minimum 30% Bumiputera participation to up to 100%.
"The Bumiputera community has a healthy participation in the oil and gas (O&G) industry with a lot of us in it. It is thus insulting to downplay the Bumiputera contribution in the sector. There is no O&G industry in Malaysia without Bumiputera players," he told Bernama.
Sofiyan said MOGSC, being the largest representative of O&G players in Malaysia, was being called upon to represent the voice of the industry, in the light of recent negative reports of Bumiputera companies being deprived of projects by Petronas.
"MOGSC has 450 members with 90% of them being Bumiputera companies and all have contracts," he added.
He said apart from Bumiputera participation, companies applying to Petronas for a licence must also possess an understanding of the industry, skills, integrity, professionalism and competency.
"Even after obtaining the licence,companies seeking a contract from Petronas must enter into the bidding process.
"There are some companies that do not want to bid as they feel securing the licence is their right to a contract.
"They do not understand the process and Petronas is very transparent with it," Sofiyan added.
He said for those interested in venturing into the O&G industry, Petronas has also provided a platform called the "vendor development programme", which is specifically to help Bumiputera companies gain expertise in desired areas.
"The Council has received complaints from companies that have the licence from Petronas but they were not invited to the bidding process, apart from those who did so and lost, although to another Bumiputera company.
"But when Petronas initiates the tender process, it considers the capability of a company. So, sometimes, a company is not put on the vendor list, as it is incapable," he added.
Commenting on the Refinery and Petrochemical Integrated Development (RAPID) in Pengerang, Johor, Sofiyan said there was no issue over contract distribution in the project, as it had still not been finalised by Petronas.
He said the final investment decision is expected to be made at the end of March next year and what Petronas was doing at present, is preparatory works such as the channelling of water to the work site.
He said Bumiputera companies interested in being involved in the project need to prepare themselves as once it is rolled out, Petronas plans to allocate certain portions for Bumiputera companies and others specifically for Johor-based entities.
Sofiyan said construction of the main plants requires billions of ringgit in investment and high technology and even non-Bumiputeras can't compete against foreign companies.
"Bumiputera companies must look therefore to maintenance and inspection projects and many more supporting jobs over the next 50 years.
"These are all projects that can sustain Bumiputera companies as a viable business. Collectively, the value of the projects to Bumiputeras, is a lot," he added.
Established in 2003, MOGSC is a non-profit organisation with membership from Malaysian-based companies, providing services to country's O&G industry and the region. – Bernama, December 29, 2013.
BY V. ANBALAGAN, ASSISTANT NEWS EDITOR
DECEMBER 28, 2013
Malaysian Consultative Council of Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, Sikkhism and Taoism president Jagir Singh says it is only an offence by non-Muslims to use the word 'Allah' to propagate their religion to Muslims. – The Malaysian Insider file pic, December 28, 2013.Selangor religious authorities cannot enforce a state law which prohibits Christians from using the word "Allah" as the legislation was declared unconstitutional by the courts four years ago.
Malaysian Consultative Council of Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, Sikkhism and Taoism (MCCBCHST) president Jagir Singh said the 2009 decision by High Court judge Datuk Lau Bee Lan ruled that non-Muslims could use words like "Allah" provided it was confined to their own religious groups.
"It is only an offence by non-Muslims to use such words to propagate their religion to Muslims," he told The Malaysian Insider.
Among the laws is an enactment restricting the use of the word "Allah" passed in the Selangor assembly 25 years ago and enforced in July 1988.
The Selangor Islamic Affairs Department (Jais) has cited the law when announcing the prohibition for other faiths.
Jagir said 10 states, including Selangor, had passed enactments to stop non-Muslims from using between 18 and 25 words, one of which was "Allah".
"We took a strong stand in 1988 as it was a clear interference in the religious practice of non-Muslims."
He said all states had identical legislation barring non-Muslims from using words exclusive to Muslims.
Jagir said Lau had ruled that the enactment to prevent non-Muslims from using words like "Allah" was unconstitutional as it was contrary to Article 11 (4) of the Federal Constitution.
Article 11 (4) states that state and federal law could only control or restrict the propagation of religious doctrines or belief among persons professing the religion of Islam.
On December 31, 2009, in a landmark ruling, Lau allowed the Catholic church's judicial review application and lifted the home minister's ban on the use of the word "Allah" in the Herald.
Lau had said that the church had a constitutional right to use the word "Allah" in its weekly on the grounds that religions other than Islam could be practised in peace and harmony.
However, the Court of Appeal on October 14 allowed Putrajaya's appeal to ban the use of "Allah" in the Herald.
A three-member bench headed by Datuk Seri Mohamed Apandi Ali ruled that the prohibition was to protect the sanctity of Islam and prevent any confusion among Muslims.
He also said that if the word was allowed to be used by Christians, it could threaten national security and public order.
The appellate court said the prohibition was reasonable on the grounds that the word Allah was not an integral part of the Christian faith and practice.
However, Jagir said the Court of Appeal did not consider the legal position of the state enactments as discussed by Lau in her judgment.
"The Court of Appeal set aside the High Court order on different grounds (national security) but did not consider the prohibition which Lau had declared unconstitutional," Jagir said in response to Jais' move to send a letter to churches in Selangor to remind them to obey a 1988 state law banning non-Muslims from using the word "Allah".
Jais director Ahmad Mohd Saad said the Islamic authority would draw up a list of Selangor churches before sending letters seeking their compliance with the enactment.
Jagir said Jais had no locus standi to issue directives to churches and other non-Muslim denominations because the Constitution allowed each religious group to manage its own affairs.
Meanwhile, the former president of the Catholic Lawyers Society, Joy Wilson Apukuttan, said Jais' move could pave the way for another legal challenge in court.
"They are acting beyond their authority," he said.
He said Pakatan Rakyat (PR), which currently administered Selangor, should take proactive steps to diffuse the situation.
"Perhaps, PR should amend the state enactment which encroached into the rights of non-Muslims," he said.
Utusan Malaysia had earlier this week claimed that a Christian group known as the International Full Gospel Fellowship had held a closed-door function at an unnamed hotel in Klang and purportedly sang songs containing the word "Allah".
The Umno-controlled Malay daily further reported that a board in the hotel lobby had featured the words: "International Full Gospel Fellowship: keluarga Allah satelit Nilai dan satelit Puchong, dari dalam gelap akan terbit terang"("God's family, Nilai and Puchong satellites, Light will shine strong from the darkness.") – December
28, 2013.